Proskauer Rose Law Firm Knows that Stephen Lamont has NO LEGAL Right to Speak on Behalf of iViewit.
So why is the Corrupt Law Firm of Proskauer Rose Responding to an Illegal Filing by Stephen Lamont on Behalf of Iviewit Technologies?
Could it be that Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose is doing this to deliberately fraud the courts, as Stephen Lamont is VERY Connected to Judith Kaye, ex-supreme court judge who was married to Proskauer Rose Partner Stephen Kaye - and Judith Kaye use to Work at IBM and is connected with William Dick who also use to work at IBM and is connected to the Iviewit Patent Suppression and iViewit Invention Theft.
So it seems to me that New York Attorney Gregg M. Mashberg, Proskauer Rose Law Firm is deliberately frauding the courts and the motive seems to me to be to cause further stalling of the Iviewit Technology patent and to further prolong the Federal RICO Lawsuit against Proskauer Rose, the Criminal Complaint and SEC Complaint Against Proskauer Rose and to Protect the Corrupt MPEG LA to keep making Billions a year on a technology that Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP knew he had stolen for MPEG LA over a Decade Ago.
So why is this all going on Right Now?
What is P. Stephen Lamont up to with Gregg M. Mashberg and the Pro Se Party over there at the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm?
Eliot Bernstein did Not initiate this at this Time, P. Stephen Lamont did and P. Stephen Lamont has No Legal Right to Speak for Eliot Bernstein, nor does P. Stephen Lamont have a right to speak for the iViewit Investors or the iViewit Inventors.
For Proskauer Rose LLP to Continue in this scam, they are blatantly playing games on Judge Shira Scheindlin and making a mockery out of the New York Courts. Gregg M. Mashberg, Proskauer Rose is Doing This Deliberately to confuse the issue and to keep Stephen Lamont involved somehow. All the Motives here are Unclear, and well it is not like YOU can Complain to the New York Bar - as Proskauer Rose LLP controls the New York Bar.
Stephen Lamont is Under Investigation for Fraudulently Representing iViewit and other Suspected Illegal Activities and though Gregg M. Mashberg and Proskauer Rose LLP KNOW this, still Gregg M. Mashberg files this JOKE on the New York Courts, Why?
Gregg M. Mashberg - Proskauer Rose LLP
Just How Corrupt is Gregg M. Mashberg- I mean Come on Stephen Lamont ILLEGALLY Files a "Bernstein Vs. Appellate Division First Department..." and Even though Gregg Mashberg, Proskauer Rose LLP Attorney KNOWS that P. Stephen Lamont has No Right to Do so, Still Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP has a RESPONSE Delivered?
A Hand Delivered Response from Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Proskauer Rose LLP, Attorney Gregg M. Mashberg RESPONDS to P. Stephen Lamont's Fraudulent Court Filings on Behalf of iViewit when Gregg M. Mashberg - Proskauer Rose LLPAttorrney knows that Stephen Lamont has no Right to be filing anything on behalf of iViewit.
Proskauer Rose LLP, Gregg M. Mashberg Attorneys Pro Se for Proskauer Rose LLP
and Attorneys for Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane and and the Estate of Steven Rackow Kaye .. and "Respectfully Submitted" - that is BULL - it is Lies and Cover Ups and no Respect Intended..
The Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP is Still representing themselves in the Iviewit Stolen Technology Case. Odd that 2 of the Above Attorneys have Died, and they are VERY Guilty of Stealing a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent. And yet still Proskauer Ross LLP seems to Run the New York Justice System and Get Their Way.
There is Tons of Proof on Proskauer Rose's Guilt in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technologies Invention and in Proskauer Roses Law Firm using this to Entice Enron, which led to the Collapse of Enron and Billions Lost to Investors. Which is the Same thing that Will Soon happen at Intel Corp. , Time Warner, Warner Bros., SONY, Lockheed Martin, and More..
So what is Gregg M. Mashberg and the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm Really Up to with this, the Latest Stunt in the Decade Old Saga of Proskauer Rose Patent Thieves for MPEG LA.
Click Here for Eliot Bernstein iViewit Technology SEC Complaint Against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Stephen Kaye, MPEG LA and many others..
Got a Tip on Gregg M. Mashberg or Proskauer Rose LLP ?
eMail me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner, Named in SEC Complaint, RICO Lawsuit over STEALING the Trillion Dollar iViewit Technology.
Michael Grebe is under an ongoing investigation over the Iviewit Technology theft. Though for over a decade Michael Grebe, Corrupt Patent Attorney at Foley and Lardner when the iViewit Technology was first STOLEN, well Michael Grebe has managed to keep the SEC off his Trail, the Dept. of Justice completely looking the other way, the USPTO ignoring the Michael Grebe Foley and Lardnerinvolvement and has managed to get State and Federal judges to cover up this mass corruption of Michael Grebe and Foley and Lardner over the Iviewit Stolen Technology.Michael Grebe GUILTY of Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Cover Ups in NOT disclosing the iViewit Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability . Michael Grebe was at Foley and Lardner and was one of the Original Patent Attorneys that Derailed the Iviewit Invention and Michael Grebe is part of Lockheed Martin USING this Invention and Making Billions From it.
Michael Grebe was a Corrupt Patent Attorney, and Michael Grebe, to this day DOES nothing to make any of this RIGHT. Inventors Rights were stomped on, there were attempts on the Lives of the Iviewit Inventors and their families.
The Iviewit Stolen Technology involves the biggest Law Firms and Tech Companies in the World and Lockheed Martin ... ALL are named in a Federal RICO Lawsuit, as well an SEC Complaint. Michael Grebe is named in the SEC Complaint, in that Federal RICO Lawsuit. There is over 1200 documents of proof - there is conversations recorded with the Corrupt Patent Attorney from Foley and Lardner, Michael Grebe - www.Iviewit.TVfor more on that.
Michael Grebe acted Criminal, seems to have paid off judges, court clerks, USPTO Officers (well that is not to hard as the head of the USPTO use to be at Foley and Lardner as did President Obama - So that's an easy one for Michael Grebe to keep hiding). Michael Grebe pulled some major strings to STEAL this patent so Lockheed Martin, Intel Corp. and many others could use this technology and the Iviewit Inventors have still not got a Dime. Even though Iviewit had Legal, Signed Contracts with Time Warner Inc. ( http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/ ) for more on that one).
Michael Grebe pulled off a Whammy in the Blatant Theft of an incredible technology that we all use. The iViewit technology is in every video you see, cable companies use it.. cell phones.. online ads and videos for everything online.. incredible zoom and pan.. the stopping of that dreaded pixalation.. ALL
he Iviewit Invention - ALL orchestrated by the Corrupt Patent Attorney from Foley and Lardner Named Michael Grebe.Michael Grebe is easily proven as GUILTY. Thing is Michael Grebe is connected to the Bush Administration, Donald Rumsfield and I believe high ups in homeland security.. Michael Grebe was General Council to the RNC~ I mean come on Michael Grebe has some serious strings to pull and boy did Michael Grebe Do just that in the mis-handling and flat out theft of a Multi-Trillion dollar technology that his cronies at Lockheed Martin wanted AND well they got it. Michael Grebe simply derailed, lied, committed fraud and there you have it.. over a decade and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology that we all use, well they get ruined, quality of life squashed, they get harassed, they get their cars bombed WITH NO INVESTIGATION... they get fake tax bills and all kinds of harassment to SHUT them up.. and Michael Grebe and Cronies.. well they GET Billions Every Year from the Iviewit Inventions.
Michael Grebe. Bradley Foundation Links to the Documents and Sound Bite regarding Michael Grebe STEALING a Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent that Michael Grebe of the Bradley Foundation, to this day covers up, lies about and commits fraud on.
Thomas Cahill Protects Michael Grebe
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN LLP - Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees
Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael C. Grebe.
Click HERE for Videos on Michael Grebe Conversations with iViewit Founder and one of the Iviewit Technology Inventors Eliot Bernstein.
Michael Grebe, Corrupt Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney Named in what NY TIMES REPORTS as an 80M LAWSUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS ...
Massive Corruption in Cover Ups in New York Courts involving Multi-Trillion Dollar iViewit Technologies STOLEN intellectual property.
Michael Grebe named in this Mass Corruption and another Massive Lawsuit over Iviewit and the Involvement of Corrupt Patent Attorney Michael Grebe of Foley and Larder. Yet over a Decade and Michael Grebe still is Seeming "Respectful" as he Endorses Candidates and Runs the Bradley Foundation.
Michael Grebe, Corrupt Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney Named in SEC Complaint. Click Here for SEC Complaint Naming Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner.
Click Here for RICO Complaint Naming Michael Grebe - Bradley Foundation over a Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent Theft of the iViewit Technologies.
MICHAEL C. GREBE, was a Chairman and CEO of Foley and Lardner - the Corrupt Patent Law Firm When the iVieiwit technology was STOLEN.
Click Here for Michael Grebe, Bradley Foundation Corruption
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Michael Grebe, Bradley Foundation - Corrupt ex-CEO of Foley and Lardner Complaint - Click here to Read more on Michael Grebe Corruption.
More on Michael Grebe - Bradley Foundation
and the Iviewit Stolen Technology Coming Soon.
www.Iviewit.TV
Michael Grebe information on line brags that "Michael Grebe ran one of the nation's largest law firms, Foley & Lardner, before joining the influential Bradley Foundation as its CEO" ~ So there you have it Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner... Is GUILTY of Patent Fraud, Criminal Activity, Shareholder Fraud, and More in the Iviewit Technology Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal.
Have a Tip on Michael Grebe Corruption, Michael Grebe Bradley Foundation or ANY Corrupt Activity of Michael Grebe while at the Corrupt Law Firm of Foley and Lardner.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Testimony at New York Senate Judiciary on Patent Corruption, Inventors Rights ...
Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 1
Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, Attempted Murder, Court Corruption
Patent Attorney Corruption, and Mass Fraud on the Courts in ALL
Judicial Branches, the USPTO and Multiple Supreme Courts.
Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 2
Iviewit Technologies - Eliot Bernstein Testifies on
Massive Corruption Surrounding
the Stealing of the Iviewit Technology.
More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Corruption in the
Iviewit Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal ... Go to..
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.Iviewit.TV
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
Lockheed Martin Corruption, Foley-Lardner Corruption, Proskauer Rose Corruption, Intel Corp. Corruption, Time Warner Inc. Corruption,
Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, Attempted Murder, Court Corruption
Patent Attorney Corruption, and Mass Fraud on the Courts in ALL
Judicial Branches, the USPTO and Multiple Supreme Courts.
Eliot Bernstein Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 2
Iviewit Technologies - Eliot Bernstein Testifies on
Massive Corruption Surrounding
the Stealing of the Iviewit Technology.
More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Corruption in the
Iviewit Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal ... Go to..
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.Iviewit.TV
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
Lockheed Martin Corruption, Foley-Lardner Corruption, Proskauer Rose Corruption, Intel Corp. Corruption, Time Warner Inc. Corruption,
Friday, October 8, 2010
MPEG LA, DVD Licensing, Toshiba - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division
More Iviewit Proof of Fraud and MPEG LA Involvement.Proskauer Rose LLP Corruption. Patent Fraud ?
June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General
" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
Dear Mr. Ramos:
This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.
You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.
I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats
The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.
In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.
The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,
(2) established the Standard Specifications.
(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.
II. The Proposed Arrangement
A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders
(4)("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:
(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);
(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and
(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.
(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.
(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.
(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."
(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."
(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.
(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.
(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"
(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.
(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.
(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.
(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.
(16)In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.
(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.
(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."
19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."
(20)Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.
(21)The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.
(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."
(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)
Full Letter and Source of Post
Save and Print the Above for Your Records.
Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY know that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.
No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.
More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.
June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General
" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
Dear Mr. Ramos:
This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.
You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.
I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats
The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.
In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.
The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,
(2) established the Standard Specifications.
(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.
II. The Proposed Arrangement
A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders
(4)("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:
(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);
(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and
(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.
(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.
(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.
(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."
(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."
(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.
(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.
(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"
(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.
(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.
(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.
(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.
(16)In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.
(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.
(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."
19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."
(20)Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.
(21)The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.
(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."
(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)
Full Letter and Source of Post
Save and Print the Above for Your Records.
Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY know that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.
No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.
More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Christopher C. Wheeler, Matthew Triggs - Proskauer Rose Frauds the Florida Supreme Court.
Christopher Clark Wheeler - Proskauer Rose LLP Corrupt Patent Attorney, Protected by Proskauer Rose Law Firm, the Florida and New York Supreme Court.
" Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes.
An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link - Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.
So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Chris Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.
Christophe Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society.
In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.
The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Eric Turner completed law school.
Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar.
For this letter alone Eric Turner should have been sent back to law school.
Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Bar review work was done well.
The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered by Matthew Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Matthew Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.
Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response.
Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Eric Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Matthew Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer Rose was not patent counsel.
Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.
Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Christopher Wheeler and Matthew Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer Rose, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.
The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught in conflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.
When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union.
Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder. "
Source of Above
Proskauer Rose LLP - Chris Wheeler Crimes
Exhibit 4 – Utley Resume as submitted by Christopher Wheeler to I View It and Board
Exhibit 19 – How to steal an applet, first act, Brian invention at home is 2nd attempt after this is foiled
******
Wheeler response to The initial small form Florida Bar complaint
Iviewit rebuttal to Wheeler response to The Florida Bar #1
some wheeler perjury to florida bar goes well with dui and somehow evades detection
******
matthew triggs - florida bar complaint - florida bar and florida supreme court refuse to docket formally the complaint although it has affirmed violations of triggs public office as a member of the florida bar and conflicting his representation of wheeler. currently under review at the united states supreme court.
supreme court of florida - iviewit original filing
florida bar response to supreme court order to respond to petition
fails to deal with any substantive issues of the petition and as such stands in default. they claim to have done a good review to the supreme court and where such review contained conflicted responses from triggs, that would have invalidated the prior reviews.
response is unintelligible and addresses parties incorrectly such as (this court) when more appropriately (this Court) and other such defined term problems.
iviewit rebuttal to florida bar non-response - supreme court of florida
florida bar response - another turner classic
Of interest -- inventor Bernstein has since discovery of the inventions told of how the inventions came to be as coming in dreams as gifts from G0D to help your children save the planet. This makes the crimes even more insidious, to read of this fascinating truth of how these inventions came to be visit the inventor.
More on the Corrupt Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler
" Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes.
An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link - Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.
So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Chris Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.
Christophe Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society.
In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.
The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Eric Turner completed law school.
Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar.
For this letter alone Eric Turner should have been sent back to law school.
Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Bar review work was done well.
The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered by Matthew Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Matthew Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.
Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response.
Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Eric Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Matthew Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer Rose was not patent counsel.
Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.
Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Christopher Wheeler and Matthew Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer Rose, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.
The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught in conflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.
When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union.
Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder. "
Source of Above
Proskauer Rose LLP - Chris Wheeler Crimes
Exhibit 4 – Utley Resume as submitted by Christopher Wheeler to I View It and Board
Exhibit 19 – How to steal an applet, first act, Brian invention at home is 2nd attempt after this is foiled
******
Wheeler response to The initial small form Florida Bar complaint
Iviewit rebuttal to Wheeler response to The Florida Bar #1
some wheeler perjury to florida bar goes well with dui and somehow evades detection
******
matthew triggs - florida bar complaint - florida bar and florida supreme court refuse to docket formally the complaint although it has affirmed violations of triggs public office as a member of the florida bar and conflicting his representation of wheeler. currently under review at the united states supreme court.
supreme court of florida - iviewit original filing
florida bar response to supreme court order to respond to petition
fails to deal with any substantive issues of the petition and as such stands in default. they claim to have done a good review to the supreme court and where such review contained conflicted responses from triggs, that would have invalidated the prior reviews.
response is unintelligible and addresses parties incorrectly such as (this court) when more appropriately (this Court) and other such defined term problems.
iviewit rebuttal to florida bar non-response - supreme court of florida
florida bar response - another turner classic
Of interest -- inventor Bernstein has since discovery of the inventions told of how the inventions came to be as coming in dreams as gifts from G0D to help your children save the planet. This makes the crimes even more insidious, to read of this fascinating truth of how these inventions came to be visit the inventor.
More on the Corrupt Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler
Foley and Larder Patent Attorney Committ Massive Fraud and is Protected by US Courts
William J. Dick - foley and lardner - Virginia state bar rebuttal - it is interesting to note that dick in his response to the the vsb sends a portfolio patent docket that the united states patent & trademark office says has some false & misleading information contained in - such as certain patents that the company has no rights, title or interests in. the vsb refuses phone calls to re-investigate based on this information that has led to uspto and federal investigations of the matters.
in the dick exhibits you will see how iviewit got dicked around as the evidence appears that there are two sets of patents with similar names and different inventors. iviewit does not attest to these documents as factual representations of the original filings as much document tampering has occurred on the patent documents. "
Source and Lots More
Judith Kaye - Ex. Supreme Court Judge who Protected Proskauer Rose Law Firm for Her Special Interests and her Husband WAS a partner (Stephen Kaye) - and her formoer Clerk and Co-Concpirator Steven Kaye WAS also at Proskauer Rose LLP. Well Judith Kaye USE to Work with William Dick at IBM... the Conflicts of Interest KEEP Rolling out on the Iviewt Stolen Patent.
Foley & Lardner – Doug Boehm, Steven Becker Bill Dick + Brain Utley Patent Crimes
Exhibit 1 – Case of inventor fraud perpetrated with I View It Counsel and Brian Utley
Exhibit 2 – How to claim others ideas as your own
Exhibit 7 – Case of Switching Inventors
Exhibit 9 – More on the Case of Walking Patents out of I View It and to your home
Exhibit 10 – Case of the Mismatched File Numbers on filed patent documents aka the cover-up
Exhibit 11 – Case of the changing patent titley
Exhibit 12 – Smudges & Fudges on 57013-112 and how to add your name to inventions that were invented without you
Exhibit 14 – Case of changing fonts again
Exhibit 16 – Case of bad math from an “engineer” and two certified engineers at Foley and Lardner, this is hours before filing, and the inventors have never seen these documents
Exhibit 20 – Cleaning up the mess of Utley Folly’s with Foley
Exhibit 22 – Another case of adding oneself to inventions one did not invent
Exhibit 33 – What happens to 57103/101
Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney for MPEG LA - Involves Attorney Raymond Anthony Joao.
Kenneth Rubenstein 's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working DIRECTLY under Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein 's direction.
Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.
No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Raymond Joao and Kenneth Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.
Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao
Raymond Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.
More on Raymond Joao Click Here
Source of Above and LOTS More
More on Iviewit Massive Shareholder Fraud
Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.
No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Raymond Joao and Kenneth Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.
Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao
Raymond Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.
More on Raymond Joao Click Here
Source of Above and LOTS More
More on Iviewit Massive Shareholder Fraud
Massive Liabilities exist for Warner Bros. for their involvement in criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities over Iviewit Scandal
Iviewit SEC Complaint NAMING Warner Bros. - Time Warner Inc.- Curtis Lu, now General Cousel of Lightsquared and Many Others over a Massive Shareholder Fraud in the Blatant, Obvious Theft of Iviewit Technologies.
" Pages 3-9
o Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged Criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of investing $25 Million Dollars of capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the Proskauer/Rubenstein/Joao filed patents and Calkins discovered initial evidence of corporate and bankruptcy frauds.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. counsel, including Smith, employees and personnel became aware of frauds relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional information regarding similar corporate frauds was also being unearthed at that time in an audit being conducted by Arthur Andersen (“Andersen”) which will be discussed further herein.
This information of what Smith and Calkin’s had discovered was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Wayne Smith and John Calkins as rational for not going forward on the Private Placement investment.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement whereby the bankruptcy and lawsuits were not disclosed that were later discovered.
The Private Placement Memorandum completed by, billed for and circulated to potential Iviewit investors, including Warner Bros et al., by Proskauer Rose.
The Fraudulent Statements by counsel and others contained in the Wachovia Private Placement, distributed for capital investment is cause for further SEC investigations of these criminal and SEC violations. Further questions arise as to Wachovia’s actions once they too were aware of the Fraud.
Per Colter, Warner Bros et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Harry Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE allegedly committed by attorneys registered with the Federal Patent Bar.
Harry Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office that resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Harry Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Amazingly, the patent office initial information which led to suspension proved that materially false information on the patents was not only given to the US Patent Office but that similar false information was given by Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer to Wachovia Securities for inclusion into the Private Placement Memorandum.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by counsel Proskauer.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO and ANTITRUST crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement, further false statements in a securities document.
At the time, I retained independent counsel, Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire to investigate the corporate and patent fraud allegations and it was confirmed that there was a bankruptcy filing and lawsuit that were not disclosed to Wachovia or Iviewit’s Board and Management that were not part of the conspiratorial efforts.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose and had stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds, found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office, the SEC through actions involving the Boca Raton Police Department (“Boca PD”) to be discussed in detail herein and other investigators.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose Law Firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and this was the supposed reason he want Kenneth Rubenstein, MPEG LA Patent Attorney... to re-opine.
The SEC should note here that in addition to the US Patent Office OED investigation of Rubenstein, Rubenstein also is under investigation with other attorneys, including Joao, all ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of Five Justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department.
Investigations ordered for “Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety” when a Proskauer partner, Steven C. Krane, violated public office rules at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
Krane caught handling Iviewit/Proskauer complaints, in order to block the complaints against his partner Kenneth Rubenstein and his firm Proskauer Rose, concealing the massive conflict he had as an Officer of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and other conflicts from other ethical public office positions he maintains in New York, while remaining a Proskauer partner.
After discovery of the alleged Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, Iviewit learned later that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros., was now working with Rubenstein who was Iviewit’s former IP counsel, MPEGLA counsel and Warner Bros. counsel.
Whereby, upon Smith’s request for Kenneth Rubenstein to re-opine, Rubenstein claimed he was conflicted with Warner Bros. et al. and Iviewit and therefore could not opine, including even to reiterate his prior opinion, as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. et al. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of the Binding Signed Agreements.
The DVD6C, MPEGLA LLC and other patent pooling schemes, where Warner Bros. and Proskauer are major participants for example in the DVD6C pool which are managed and monetized by Warner Bros., Proskauer and Rubenstein.
The pooling schemes are alleged to be merely artifices to STEAL INVENTIONS FROM INVENTORS in violation of multiple Antitrust laws and have illegally precluded me from market in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
The Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in and inuring benefit from are also using the technologies in violation of Signed and Binding Contracts and Licensing Agreements, admittedly.
Yet, since that time Warner Bros. have also excluded Iviewit from market tying and bundling the technologies in their licensing schemes, again in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 years of knowing infringement and the Massive Liabilities to Shareholders that mounts daily.
Click Here for Official Fingerprinted Iviewit Document "
More on Iviewit Patent Theft
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.iViewit.TV
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
www.BruceSewell.com
" Pages 3-9
o Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged Criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of investing $25 Million Dollars of capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the Proskauer/Rubenstein/Joao filed patents and Calkins discovered initial evidence of corporate and bankruptcy frauds.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. counsel, including Smith, employees and personnel became aware of frauds relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional information regarding similar corporate frauds was also being unearthed at that time in an audit being conducted by Arthur Andersen (“Andersen”) which will be discussed further herein.
This information of what Smith and Calkin’s had discovered was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Wayne Smith and John Calkins as rational for not going forward on the Private Placement investment.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement whereby the bankruptcy and lawsuits were not disclosed that were later discovered.
The Private Placement Memorandum completed by, billed for and circulated to potential Iviewit investors, including Warner Bros et al., by Proskauer Rose.
The Fraudulent Statements by counsel and others contained in the Wachovia Private Placement, distributed for capital investment is cause for further SEC investigations of these criminal and SEC violations. Further questions arise as to Wachovia’s actions once they too were aware of the Fraud.
Per Colter, Warner Bros et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Harry Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE allegedly committed by attorneys registered with the Federal Patent Bar.
Harry Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office that resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Harry Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Amazingly, the patent office initial information which led to suspension proved that materially false information on the patents was not only given to the US Patent Office but that similar false information was given by Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer to Wachovia Securities for inclusion into the Private Placement Memorandum.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by counsel Proskauer.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO and ANTITRUST crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement, further false statements in a securities document.
At the time, I retained independent counsel, Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire to investigate the corporate and patent fraud allegations and it was confirmed that there was a bankruptcy filing and lawsuit that were not disclosed to Wachovia or Iviewit’s Board and Management that were not part of the conspiratorial efforts.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose and had stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds, found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office, the SEC through actions involving the Boca Raton Police Department (“Boca PD”) to be discussed in detail herein and other investigators.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose Law Firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and this was the supposed reason he want Kenneth Rubenstein, MPEG LA Patent Attorney... to re-opine.
The SEC should note here that in addition to the US Patent Office OED investigation of Rubenstein, Rubenstein also is under investigation with other attorneys, including Joao, all ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of Five Justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department.
Investigations ordered for “Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety” when a Proskauer partner, Steven C. Krane, violated public office rules at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
Krane caught handling Iviewit/Proskauer complaints, in order to block the complaints against his partner Kenneth Rubenstein and his firm Proskauer Rose, concealing the massive conflict he had as an Officer of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and other conflicts from other ethical public office positions he maintains in New York, while remaining a Proskauer partner.
After discovery of the alleged Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, Iviewit learned later that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros., was now working with Rubenstein who was Iviewit’s former IP counsel, MPEGLA counsel and Warner Bros. counsel.
Whereby, upon Smith’s request for Kenneth Rubenstein to re-opine, Rubenstein claimed he was conflicted with Warner Bros. et al. and Iviewit and therefore could not opine, including even to reiterate his prior opinion, as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. et al. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of the Binding Signed Agreements.
The DVD6C, MPEGLA LLC and other patent pooling schemes, where Warner Bros. and Proskauer are major participants for example in the DVD6C pool which are managed and monetized by Warner Bros., Proskauer and Rubenstein.
The pooling schemes are alleged to be merely artifices to STEAL INVENTIONS FROM INVENTORS in violation of multiple Antitrust laws and have illegally precluded me from market in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
The Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in and inuring benefit from are also using the technologies in violation of Signed and Binding Contracts and Licensing Agreements, admittedly.
Yet, since that time Warner Bros. have also excluded Iviewit from market tying and bundling the technologies in their licensing schemes, again in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 years of knowing infringement and the Massive Liabilities to Shareholders that mounts daily.
Click Here for Official Fingerprinted Iviewit Document "
More on Iviewit Patent Theft
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.iViewit.TV
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
www.BruceSewell.com
Monday, October 4, 2010
Proskauer Rose LLP Elects Joseph M. Leccese as Chairman of the Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP.
Does Joseph M. Leccese Know about the Federal RICO Lawsuit that Proskauer Rose LLP is involved in over the STEALING of the Iviewit Technologies ?
Does Joseph Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP NEW Chairman KNOW about the HUGE Liability he is Taking in NOT Looking into the Kenneth Rubenstein and Illegal Patent Pooling of MPEG LA over the Iviewit Technologies ?
Joseph Leccese is in deep on this... Does Joseph Leccese know of the SEC Complaint that Proskauer Rose is involved over the Iviewit Technology?
Does Joseph Leccese KNOW about the Perjured Deposisiton of Kenneth Rubenstein Proskauer Rose LLP over the Blatant Theft of a Multi-Trillion Dollar Technology.
My Guess is that Joseph Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP is Either CLUELESS or Corrupt .. Either way is dangerous.
Here is the Breaking NEWS on Proskauer Rose LLP, as if it's a Good Thing..
Proskauer Rose LLP has Elected Joseph M. Leccese as Chairman
Proskauer Rose LLP has elected Joseph M. Leccese as the next Chairman of Proskauer Rose LLP .
Joseph M. Leccese is said to be assuming office in January 2011.
Joseph M. Leccese is 49, is the youngest Chairman of Proskauer Rose’s 135-year history.
Joseph M. Leccese began his legal career at the firm as a summer associate, and is currently a Partner in the Corporate Department, a member of the firm’s Executive Committee, and co-head of its renowned Sports Law Group .
Joseph M. Leccese will succeed Allen I. Fagin , who has served as Proskauer's Chairman since 2005, and is completing his maximum six year term as Chairman.
This Corrupt Gibberish is Said on Allen Fagin
“Under Allen’s leadership, Proskauer Rose LLP has made significant strides building a global platform, expanding our presence in key markets, enhancing our capabilities in a number of practice areas and deftly navigating challenging economic times,” said Mr. Leccese. “I am honored and delighted to take on this role as the firm enters its next exciting chapter.”
According to Allen Fagin , Joseph M. Leccese is the right person to continue the firm’s momentum and growth to best serve its clients. This means that Joseph M. Leccese is the Right Man to keep the Legacy of Corruption Alive at Proskauer Rose LLP, and that Joseph Leccese is easily bought of... and will HIDE their Secrets..
Joseph M. Leccese will maintain his practice, represents many of the most prominent sports teams, leagues and sports lenders in a range of corporate, finance and transactional matters, including the National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League, Major League Soccer, the ATP Tour, the WTA Tour, J.P. Morgan, Citibank and Bank of America.
Ok so the Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP is in Bed with the Corrupt JP Morgan, no wonder the Cozy - Cozy with George Demos who Protected JP Morgan from the SEC Fraud Charges over $ 300 Million Dollars ...
Joseph M. Leccese also has led numerous stadium and arena developments and related project financings, including the New Meadowlands Stadium, Prudential Center, Amway Center and Lincoln Financial Field. - GOT an tips on Corruption, Conflicts of Interest ??? on Joseph M. Leccese -
Over the past six years, Proskauer Rose has opened offices in Chicago, Hong Kong, London, and São Paulo, and increased its revenues by over sixty percent. The firm recently announced plans to move its New York headquarters in early 2011 to a new, state-of-the-art building at 11 Times Square.
About Proskauer Rose LLP
Founded in 1875, Proskauer Rose is a global law firm widely recognized for its leadership in a variety of legal services provided to clients worldwide from offices in Boca Raton, Boston, Chicago, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, New Orleans, New York, Newark, Paris, São Paulo and Washington, DC. Additional information about the firm, which has extensive experience in all areas of practice important to businesses, not-for-profit institutions and individuals.
Source information in post on
Joseph M. Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP Post
More on Allen Fagin at
www.AllenFagin.com
More on Proskauer Rose Fraud at
http://www.proskauersucks.com/
and More To Come on Joseph M. Leccese
at http://www.josephleccese.com/
posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Does Joseph Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP NEW Chairman KNOW about the HUGE Liability he is Taking in NOT Looking into the Kenneth Rubenstein and Illegal Patent Pooling of MPEG LA over the Iviewit Technologies ?
Joseph Leccese is in deep on this... Does Joseph Leccese know of the SEC Complaint that Proskauer Rose is involved over the Iviewit Technology?
Does Joseph Leccese KNOW about the Perjured Deposisiton of Kenneth Rubenstein Proskauer Rose LLP over the Blatant Theft of a Multi-Trillion Dollar Technology.
My Guess is that Joseph Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP is Either CLUELESS or Corrupt .. Either way is dangerous.
Here is the Breaking NEWS on Proskauer Rose LLP, as if it's a Good Thing..
Proskauer Rose LLP has Elected Joseph M. Leccese as Chairman
Proskauer Rose LLP has elected Joseph M. Leccese as the next Chairman of Proskauer Rose LLP .
Joseph M. Leccese is said to be assuming office in January 2011.
Joseph M. Leccese is 49, is the youngest Chairman of Proskauer Rose’s 135-year history.
Joseph M. Leccese began his legal career at the firm as a summer associate, and is currently a Partner in the Corporate Department, a member of the firm’s Executive Committee, and co-head of its renowned Sports Law Group .
Joseph M. Leccese will succeed Allen I. Fagin , who has served as Proskauer's Chairman since 2005, and is completing his maximum six year term as Chairman.
This Corrupt Gibberish is Said on Allen Fagin
“Under Allen’s leadership, Proskauer Rose LLP has made significant strides building a global platform, expanding our presence in key markets, enhancing our capabilities in a number of practice areas and deftly navigating challenging economic times,” said Mr. Leccese. “I am honored and delighted to take on this role as the firm enters its next exciting chapter.”
According to Allen Fagin , Joseph M. Leccese is the right person to continue the firm’s momentum and growth to best serve its clients. This means that Joseph M. Leccese is the Right Man to keep the Legacy of Corruption Alive at Proskauer Rose LLP, and that Joseph Leccese is easily bought of... and will HIDE their Secrets..
Joseph M. Leccese will maintain his practice, represents many of the most prominent sports teams, leagues and sports lenders in a range of corporate, finance and transactional matters, including the National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League, Major League Soccer, the ATP Tour, the WTA Tour, J.P. Morgan, Citibank and Bank of America.
Ok so the Corrupt Proskauer Rose LLP is in Bed with the Corrupt JP Morgan, no wonder the Cozy - Cozy with George Demos who Protected JP Morgan from the SEC Fraud Charges over $ 300 Million Dollars ...
Joseph M. Leccese also has led numerous stadium and arena developments and related project financings, including the New Meadowlands Stadium, Prudential Center, Amway Center and Lincoln Financial Field. - GOT an tips on Corruption, Conflicts of Interest ??? on Joseph M. Leccese -
Over the past six years, Proskauer Rose has opened offices in Chicago, Hong Kong, London, and São Paulo, and increased its revenues by over sixty percent. The firm recently announced plans to move its New York headquarters in early 2011 to a new, state-of-the-art building at 11 Times Square.
About Proskauer Rose LLP
Founded in 1875, Proskauer Rose is a global law firm widely recognized for its leadership in a variety of legal services provided to clients worldwide from offices in Boca Raton, Boston, Chicago, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, New Orleans, New York, Newark, Paris, São Paulo and Washington, DC. Additional information about the firm, which has extensive experience in all areas of practice important to businesses, not-for-profit institutions and individuals.
Source information in post on
Joseph M. Leccese - Proskauer Rose LLP Post
More on Allen Fagin at
www.AllenFagin.com
More on Proskauer Rose Fraud at
http://www.proskauersucks.com/
and More To Come on Joseph M. Leccese
at http://www.josephleccese.com/
posted Here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners about to get Billions Recalled over the Lightsquared - Curtis Lu Scandal.
Poor Billionaire Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners - he seems to be worried about Media talking trash about Harbinger Capital Partners.
Why? Well Because he is about to Lose Billions ... If ONLY those Savvy Investors would Just Sit down and Shut up.. and Please Stop Asking Harbinger Capital and Philip Falcone about that " LightSquared " - "Curtis Lu" Fiasco.
Philip Falcone , Harbinger Capital Partners SEEMS to Urging his "Wealthy Clients" not to talk to Reporters.. hmm.. well there ya go. .that's a Solution for ya.
Philip Falcone , the hedge fund manager, Harbinger Capital Partners has $9 billion at stake.. and needs the Media to Silence the Trash Talk and NOW !!
"In a roughly 45-minute investor call on Wednesday, Falcone was critical of news stories that have characterized the New York hedge fund’s nearly $3 billion investment in an upstart mobile broadband company as a risky gamble, said three people who listened to the morning investor call. Falcone also expressed dismay that some investors had been talking to reporters and he urged his wealthy clients to stop doing so. "
Lightsquared is MORE then Risky - it is NOW a Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability brought to Lightsquared by the Fateful Hiring of Curtis Lu - Former Time Warner Inc.
Link to the Philip Falcone , Harbinger Capital Partners Whining..
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/harbinger-manager-falcone-hits-out-at-media/
***********
More on the Harbinger Capital Partners - Lightsquared Multi-Billion Dollar Fiasco
My Comments are in Red... ( Just for Fun )
""Harbinger's Falcone has a beef with the media ""
"The investor call comes as some of Falcone's wealthy investors are getting anxious over the poor performance of several of his four main funds. His flagship Harbinger Capital Partners fund is down about 13 percent for the year. A $2 billion fund holding hard-to-sell assets is down more than 18 percent this year.
Investors Better Do More than get "anxious" - the Iviewit Techology Liability now at Lightsquared is a Multi-Trillion Dollar Disaster waiting to Happen - Do your Homework.
Friday is the deadline for investors in the flagship fund to submit a notice to redeem all or some of their money.
One investor who listened to the call said he thought Falcone's intent was "to be reassuring to investors."
Falcone told investors he was disappointed it has taken longer than he anticipated to give back money in the fund holding hard-to-sell assets. But people who listened to the call said Falcone said he expected that to change soon.
I Don't Think So.. I Think THINGS are Going to Get a Whole lot worse for Philip Falcone - Harbinger Capital Partners. You Just watch and SEE.. if you Can Afford it.
Some investors also are uneasy with Harbinger's ownership of an upstart high-speed Internet company called LightSquared, which plans to use satellites and array of land-based cell towers to bring broadband service to every corner of the United States.
Look Close at the Scandal Brewing over Curtis Lu - Lightsquared General Counsel and the SEC Complaint, Federal RICO Lawsuit and Massive Sharefholder Fraud over the Iviewit Scandal.
Harbinger's two largest investment funds have sunk nearly 40 percent of their assets into LightSquared. And even with that big equity commitment, industry analysts say LightSquared may need to raise an additional $5 billion to build out the so-called 4G telecom network.
Falcone, in an email exchange with Reuters prior to the investor call, said he will likely have another investor call in the next few weeks to specifically discuss LightSquared and the hedge fund's telecom strategy.
Wouldn't You Just Love to be a Fly on the Wall and See how Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners Sooths, Comforts those Nervous Billionaires and Possibly even Flat Out lies to them..
In November, LightSquared hopes to launch the first of two satellites that are critical to the success of its network.
Investment bank UBS (UBS.N ) is in the process of putting together a $750 million loan package for LightSquared to pay-off some of its existing debt and pay expenses, said people familiar with the deal.
UBS Bank KNOWS of the Iviewit Liability they are ALL over My Blogs on the Curtis Lu - Lightsquared Liability.. Look Close Billionaires. .Your About to LOSE it ALL..
Falcone, who made billions for his investors in 2007 by betting against the subprime mortgage market, said in his email exchange with Reuters that his funds began to turn a corner in September. He wants his investors to have a bit more patience.
Yes Just be Patient, hang on a bit longer and you WILL lose it all as Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners DID no Homework - Investigations at all before he brought a Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability to LightSquared in the hiring of Curtis Lu as the Lightsquared General Counsel - Formerly the General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.
"The good news," he said in the email, "we actually are making money this month. Yes, we are turning it around."
Falcone declined to talk specifics. But he may be alluding to Harbinger's Credit Distressed Blue Line fund, which has about $1 billion in assets and is said to be posting positive returns this year, according to people familiar with the fund.
Even his flagship fund, despite being one of the hedge fund industry's worst performers, is up nearly 3 percent in September.
Still, some investors are beginning to walk away.
Smart.. but don't Walk - RUN !!!
The New York State Common Retirement Fund, as first reported by Bloomberg Markets, is pulling its $68 million investment from Harbinger.
The state pension fund recently submitted a request to Falcone to redeem $41 million from Harbinger. Pension fund spokesman Dennis Tompkins said a request to redeem an initial $27 million was submitted to Falcone in January.
Harbinger requires investors in the flagship fund to give 90 days' notice before redeeming their money. Falcone has been returning about 25 percent of an investor's money in the fund each quarter -- meaning it can take up to a year for investors to fully exit Harbinger."
Source of Quotes Above ( My Words were in RED )
******
Links to Harbinger Capital Partners POSTS on the Curtis Lu - LightSquared Liability
Harbinger Capital Partners - Listens to Iviewit Technologies Call with Curtis Lu, now the General Counsel at Lightsquared and Harbinger Capital Partners KNOWS of the Liability.
Lightsquared - General Counsel Curtis Lu Named in SEC Complaint
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
Time Warner Inc. CEO Ignores
Massive Shareholder Fraud
www.DeniedPatent.com
more on the Iviewit Stolen Technology
posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Why? Well Because he is about to Lose Billions ... If ONLY those Savvy Investors would Just Sit down and Shut up.. and Please Stop Asking Harbinger Capital and Philip Falcone about that " LightSquared " - "Curtis Lu" Fiasco.
Philip Falcone , Harbinger Capital Partners SEEMS to Urging his "Wealthy Clients" not to talk to Reporters.. hmm.. well there ya go. .that's a Solution for ya.
Philip Falcone , the hedge fund manager, Harbinger Capital Partners has $9 billion at stake.. and needs the Media to Silence the Trash Talk and NOW !!
"In a roughly 45-minute investor call on Wednesday, Falcone was critical of news stories that have characterized the New York hedge fund’s nearly $3 billion investment in an upstart mobile broadband company as a risky gamble, said three people who listened to the morning investor call. Falcone also expressed dismay that some investors had been talking to reporters and he urged his wealthy clients to stop doing so. "
Lightsquared is MORE then Risky - it is NOW a Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability brought to Lightsquared by the Fateful Hiring of Curtis Lu - Former Time Warner Inc.
Link to the Philip Falcone , Harbinger Capital Partners Whining..
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/harbinger-manager-falcone-hits-out-at-media/
***********
More on the Harbinger Capital Partners - Lightsquared Multi-Billion Dollar Fiasco
My Comments are in Red... ( Just for Fun )
""Harbinger's Falcone has a beef with the media ""
"The investor call comes as some of Falcone's wealthy investors are getting anxious over the poor performance of several of his four main funds. His flagship Harbinger Capital Partners fund is down about 13 percent for the year. A $2 billion fund holding hard-to-sell assets is down more than 18 percent this year.
Investors Better Do More than get "anxious" - the Iviewit Techology Liability now at Lightsquared is a Multi-Trillion Dollar Disaster waiting to Happen - Do your Homework.
Friday is the deadline for investors in the flagship fund to submit a notice to redeem all or some of their money.
One investor who listened to the call said he thought Falcone's intent was "to be reassuring to investors."
Falcone told investors he was disappointed it has taken longer than he anticipated to give back money in the fund holding hard-to-sell assets. But people who listened to the call said Falcone said he expected that to change soon.
I Don't Think So.. I Think THINGS are Going to Get a Whole lot worse for Philip Falcone - Harbinger Capital Partners. You Just watch and SEE.. if you Can Afford it.
Some investors also are uneasy with Harbinger's ownership of an upstart high-speed Internet company called LightSquared, which plans to use satellites and array of land-based cell towers to bring broadband service to every corner of the United States.
Look Close at the Scandal Brewing over Curtis Lu - Lightsquared General Counsel and the SEC Complaint, Federal RICO Lawsuit and Massive Sharefholder Fraud over the Iviewit Scandal.
Harbinger's two largest investment funds have sunk nearly 40 percent of their assets into LightSquared. And even with that big equity commitment, industry analysts say LightSquared may need to raise an additional $5 billion to build out the so-called 4G telecom network.
Falcone, in an email exchange with Reuters prior to the investor call, said he will likely have another investor call in the next few weeks to specifically discuss LightSquared and the hedge fund's telecom strategy.
Wouldn't You Just Love to be a Fly on the Wall and See how Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners Sooths, Comforts those Nervous Billionaires and Possibly even Flat Out lies to them..
In November, LightSquared hopes to launch the first of two satellites that are critical to the success of its network.
Investment bank UBS (UBS.N ) is in the process of putting together a $750 million loan package for LightSquared to pay-off some of its existing debt and pay expenses, said people familiar with the deal.
UBS Bank KNOWS of the Iviewit Liability they are ALL over My Blogs on the Curtis Lu - Lightsquared Liability.. Look Close Billionaires. .Your About to LOSE it ALL..
Falcone, who made billions for his investors in 2007 by betting against the subprime mortgage market, said in his email exchange with Reuters that his funds began to turn a corner in September. He wants his investors to have a bit more patience.
Yes Just be Patient, hang on a bit longer and you WILL lose it all as Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital Partners DID no Homework - Investigations at all before he brought a Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability to LightSquared in the hiring of Curtis Lu as the Lightsquared General Counsel - Formerly the General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.
"The good news," he said in the email, "we actually are making money this month. Yes, we are turning it around."
Falcone declined to talk specifics. But he may be alluding to Harbinger's Credit Distressed Blue Line fund, which has about $1 billion in assets and is said to be posting positive returns this year, according to people familiar with the fund.
Even his flagship fund, despite being one of the hedge fund industry's worst performers, is up nearly 3 percent in September.
Still, some investors are beginning to walk away.
Smart.. but don't Walk - RUN !!!
The New York State Common Retirement Fund, as first reported by Bloomberg Markets, is pulling its $68 million investment from Harbinger.
The state pension fund recently submitted a request to Falcone to redeem $41 million from Harbinger. Pension fund spokesman Dennis Tompkins said a request to redeem an initial $27 million was submitted to Falcone in January.
Harbinger requires investors in the flagship fund to give 90 days' notice before redeeming their money. Falcone has been returning about 25 percent of an investor's money in the fund each quarter -- meaning it can take up to a year for investors to fully exit Harbinger."
Source of Quotes Above ( My Words were in RED )
******
Links to Harbinger Capital Partners POSTS on the Curtis Lu - LightSquared Liability
Harbinger Capital Partners - Listens to Iviewit Technologies Call with Curtis Lu, now the General Counsel at Lightsquared and Harbinger Capital Partners KNOWS of the Liability.
Lightsquared - General Counsel Curtis Lu Named in SEC Complaint
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
Time Warner Inc. CEO Ignores
Massive Shareholder Fraud
www.DeniedPatent.com
more on the Iviewit Stolen Technology
posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Perjured Deposition by Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein - MPEG LA Corrupt Patent Pooling.
Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose LLP - Working with MPEG LA. Kenneth Rubenstein Perjured himself in Depositions Regarding the Iviewit Technologies Patents in Which Kenneth Rubenstein was Directly Involved in Derailing the Rightful Inventors to Getting their Rightful Patent.
MPEG LA - with the Help of Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney, Pooled the Technology in patents and well the Iviewit Inventors NEVER got rights or any compensation for the Mult-Trillion Dollar Invention that WE ALL USE.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6 - Final
www.Iviewit.TV
For More on Iviewit
www.ProskauerSucks.com
more on Proskauer Rose Corruption
http://www.kennethrubenstein.com/
more on MPEG LA Corruption and Kenneth Rubenstein
Corrupt Patent Attorney.
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
MPEG LA - with the Help of Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney, Pooled the Technology in patents and well the Iviewit Inventors NEVER got rights or any compensation for the Mult-Trillion Dollar Invention that WE ALL USE.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6 - Final
www.Iviewit.TV
For More on Iviewit
www.ProskauerSucks.com
more on Proskauer Rose Corruption
http://www.kennethrubenstein.com/
more on MPEG LA Corruption and Kenneth Rubenstein
Corrupt Patent Attorney.
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)