Eliot Bernstein Notifies Florida Governor of Massive Florida Corruption at the Suggestion of Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum.
" Friday, September 03, 2010
Hon. Governor Charlie Crist
Office of Governor Charlie Crist
State of Florida
Dear Honorable Governor Charlie Crist,
Per the Attorney General of the Great State of Florida, I write to you for inclusion into the ongoing Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury, the Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit companies claims of criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities by certain members of the Florida Supreme Court, the Florida Bar, the Boca Raton P.D., the law firms Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley & Lardner LLP and more.
The extent of these claims of Public Office Corruption reach the highest levels of Florida government and thus are germane to the Grand Jury’s request for information and stated purpose, “The Office of Statewide Prosecution has established a public corruption hotline for anyone who believes they have information concerning a criminal offense involving public corruption or wishes to suggest issues the Statewide Grand Jury should investigate regarding public corruption.
Below is a communication from Attorney General McCollum in response to my request to his offices for inclusion, whereby he urges me to contact and join your offices of these most serious allegations as well.
I am contacting your offices again, as I have contacted them in the past regarding these matters and am asking that your offices take all actions necessary to have these allegations investigated by the Florida Grand Jury your office has convened, as well as, any other criminal actions you may deem appropriate in investigating these matters and notifying the proper authorities of the allegations alleged herein and in the URL links provided herein.
I am happy to provide additional information or testimony relating to the matters to any investigators you deem appropriate or before the Grand Jury.
Many of these matters have crossed state lines through the law firms accused and in New York, a NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq. has identified a Racketeering type organization within not only the NY Courts and NY Disciplinary Agencies but the NY prosecutorial offices, including the US Attorney, the NY Attorney General Cuomo’s offices and the NY District Attorneys Office.
The allegations rise to senior members of these public offices acting in conspiracy to deprive due process to citizens’ complaints against them and in fact, a “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein of the NY Supreme Court was allegedly according to Anderson Whitewashing attorney complaints for these prosecutors. In addition, Anderson claims “favored lawyers and law firms” had their complaints cleaned as well.
The Anderson case now also involves Federal Obstruction of Justice in a federal Lawsuit, with death threats on Federal Witnesses on their way to testify in Federal Court. Extortion of state employees is also evidenced in Anderson, replete with physical assaults on the 60 yr. female Anderson, to either aid and abet or else by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials.
My Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit filed alongside and in support of Anderson’s Historic and Heroic Whistleblower claims, was legally “related” to the Anderson Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.
Many of the defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST are located here in Florida, in fact all of my claims began in Florida, as that is where my companies and myself were located at the time the criminal activities were first discovered.
Proskauer partners were ordered for Investigation for Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public office by the New York Supreme Court, in a unanimous consent of five justices of that court but those investigations are now under investigation for their failure to investigate.
The allegations in NY are almost identical to those I filed in Florida just different players from the same firms often having infiltrated and violated public offices to deny due process to my complaints in violation of law and attorney and judicial conduct codes.
All of my complaints in Florida in the courts and to all state agencies are herein officially requested to be re-opened in light of the revelations of new and damning information revealed in Anderson and new evidence against certain defendants in my lawsuit from Florida.
New evidence includes Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP and Partner Thomas Sjoblom’s involvement in the ExSir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme, Sjoblom found aiding and abetting Stanford Employees in a Miami Airport Hanger teaching them how to lie to SEC and FBI investigators.
As you know, Proskauer has been sued in a Global Class Action for the entire damages of Stanford, approximately 7 Billion US Dollars. Another thread to Florida is another Defendant in my Fed RICO, now infamous Ponzi schemer, Marc S. Dreier, Esq., who has been sentenced to 20 years for his Ponzi scheme.
Greenberg Traurig law firm, who represents the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court in my Fed RICO, acting in conflict as Greenberg Traurig was also former Patent Counsel for my companies and myself, where Greenberg has recently been alleged running a large Ponzi scheme in Florida, more information below. A link too many of the Florida specific crimes can be found at
http://iviewit.tv/supreme%20court/index.htm
and
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm
Complaints filed in Florida with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court are requested to be re-opened by your offices with oversight by your offices to mitigate any further conflicts of interest and violations of Public Offices and law.
Complaints filed with the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court against, Florida Bar employees, Florida Supreme Court Public Officials, Proskauer Partners Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. who was convicted of Felony DUI with Injury in Florida and Matthew Triggs who violated Florida Bar Rules in handling Complaints in multiple conflicts and violation of public office of the Florida Bar, are also being requested herein to have formal investigations into the matters reheard entirely based on a plethora of new information and evidence against the defendants in those matters and again instituted with oversight of your offices.
Similarly, we are requesting that your offices investigate the Florida Civil Court Case Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB with new evidence showing a complete fraud on the court was orchestrated by Proskauer and Judge Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court, prior to your appointment of Labarga to the Florida Supreme Court.
I also note that members of your inner staff are formerly with Defendant Foley & Lardner, who acted as Solicitor General to the Florida Supreme Court while my complaints were being reviewed by that Court.
I also note that Justice Jorge Labarga and several of the Florida Supreme Court Justice and Court Officials are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. I also note that several members or former members of the Florida Bar are Defendants in my Trillion Dollar Fed RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit.
Therefore, I request further that your offices in handling these matters proceed with extreme caution in ferreting out ALL Conflicts of Interest prior to involvement by any party, to preclude further possible charges against members of your office or any other party your offices join into these matters.
I have attached a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for all parties, including yourself, to sign and return to my office at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY Actions you take in even considering the matter.
As a mass of Conflicts of Interest have been discovered in these matters already and the Whistleblower further identifying a criminal conspiracy within state agencies, this Conflict form is essential to ensuring fair and impartial due process of law by non conflicted parties. Any conflicts identified may be considered based on full disclosure and agreement by ALL parties involved or new non conflicted parties must be retained prior to disclosure of even the most basic information.
As these matters in New York and Florida are against some of the highest ranking officials in the states, I know that in New York Anderson and now other related cases and witnesses who testified to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee are seeking various forms of witness protection, I similarly would like to know what options for this type of protection are available to those who come forward in Florida.
As a car bombing victim of the RICO Criminal Enterprise, described in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit I feel that certain protections should already have been availed, in fact, I petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for such once already and this Motion is located at the URL
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004_10_07_Supreme_Court_Florida_Motion_Final_Cert_Signed.pdf
as well as, repeated requests since it was determined by Florida Fire Investigator Rick Lee that accelerants’ were the cause of the explosion that blew up three cars next to it, in Boynton Beach Florida. Despite repeated notice to Florida Law Enforcement, as you can see from the previous link they too were involved in the second act that protection from the court was requested for and therefore have never investigated these matters through public office corruption after public office corruption after public office corruption as defined herein and in the attached URL’s.
Please make all exhibits and links fully incorporated by reference herein into this letter for formal docketing in the Florida Grand Jury Request of Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Companies, each URL may have several URL’s, also hereby incorporated entirely by reference herein and for further use by the Grand Jury.
As Whistleblower Anderson in a sworn statement has claimed that she witnessed document destruction of investigatory files first hand (Anderson’s Statement to the New York Judiciary Committee attached below), please print each and every url in entirety for inclusion into this document and due to the fact that these matters pertain to US Patent Rights of an inventor, please retain these files and information for a period of no less than 20 yrs.
There are over a thousand documents at the URL http://www.iviewit.tv/ on the homepage under the Evidence Section on the homepage for your review and for docketing with the complaints and for review by investigators or Grand Jurors.
Despite whether the Florida Grand Jury investigates these most serious allegations of corruption at the highest levels of Florida Government, let this letter also serve as a formal request that your offices begin all necessary notices and/or investigations and notify all investigatory bodies necessary to investigate all those persons named in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit from Florida and notify them of the new evidence and requests for an entire review of all prior actions by any Florida Agency listed herein or in the URL’s embedded herein.
Please formally notify the following offices of this submission, including but not limited to, the Florida Inspector General (copied herein), the Florida US Attorney, the necessary Florida District Attorneys and the Florida Attorney General of the allegations and information contained herein, please have all parties sign prior to acceptance of ANY materials a Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, again prior to ANY actions or decisions being rendered or transfer of any confidential information.
Please take this communication as both a request to join the 19th Florida Grand Jury and Request for Formal Investigations of all of the following Florida Defendants in my Fed RICO and ANTITRUST by the Florida Governor and Florida Attorney General’s offices, please docket a separate complaint for each Florida organization and individual listed below;
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual
capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and
individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional
and individual capacities,AMENDED
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his COMPLAINT
professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional
and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional
and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA,
OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official
and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her
official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual
capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual
capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual
capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual
capacities,BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and
individual capacities
HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and
individual capacities,
HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and
individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual
capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and
individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.
BOCA RATON Police Department
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and
individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual
capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional
and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.,
ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional
and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional
and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional
and individual capacities,
HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, "
******
Above Letter From Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Technologies Founder and Main Inventor to Florida's Governor Charlie Crist ... AGAIN... What will Governor Charlie Crist of Florida do with this Knowing of Blatant and Widespread Corruption This Time ??
I will Let You Know.
In My Opinion, if Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum and if Governor Charlie Crist IGNORES this information, Well Time for a RICO Lawsuit, a Whistleblower Lawsuit AGAINST the STATE of FLORIDA for aiding and abetting Massive Shareholder Fraud, Major Crime and Corruption, Government Corruption and for Hiding Secrets that will Cost Taxpayers - Investors - Shareholders BILLIONS of Dollars.
More on the Massive Corruption in Florida
www.FloridaGrandJury.com
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
got a Tip on Corruption in Florida,
or on Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General,
Or On Governor Charlie Crist ??
eMail me
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Friday, September 3, 2010
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Intel Corporation is a Crime Ring, a Deliberate Fraud on Consumers, Wiping OUT all Competition with Brute Force and Bribes.
"FTC Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?"
Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998..
So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?
Over a Decade. And Consumers are Still Paying the Price, Shareholders are Paying for Intel's Crimes and Will SOON pay Billions More.. Tax Payers pay for the Over Looking by Your Governement Agent's of Intel's Crimes..
Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
when is ENOUGH - Enough with Intel...??
"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5.
Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of
Docket 9341
discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.
Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.
Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.
Three Components of Monopoly Recovery
Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:
1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis.
See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.
2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.
3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost.
Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check.
Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.
Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act
Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials.
That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric.
Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.
Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels.
Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.
Rebate Values are Sustained from back in time with
forward time purchase agreements.
Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences.
Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels.
PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.
This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel.
That is the nature of the charge back;
for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows
through PC Companies to Intel.
Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer Product Flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule. ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...
Above Report by Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Do You Have an Intel Corruption Tip?
Email Me...
Time to Tell the Truth about Intel Corp.
and ALL their "Corrupt Fraternity"..
This is Not Intel Nation
this is "We the People" and Intel Corp.
is Robbing Consumers, Governments and
paying Off everyone who gets in their way...
or Worse... and this is in Many Countries..
www.InvestigativeBlogger.com
Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998..
So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?
Over a Decade. And Consumers are Still Paying the Price, Shareholders are Paying for Intel's Crimes and Will SOON pay Billions More.. Tax Payers pay for the Over Looking by Your Governement Agent's of Intel's Crimes..
Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
when is ENOUGH - Enough with Intel...??
"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5.
Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of
Docket 9341
discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.
Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.
Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.
Three Components of Monopoly Recovery
Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:
1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis.
See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.
2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.
3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost.
Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check.
Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.
Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act
Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials.
That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric.
Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.
Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels.
Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.
Rebate Values are Sustained from back in time with
forward time purchase agreements.
Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences.
Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels.
PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.
This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel.
That is the nature of the charge back;
for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows
through PC Companies to Intel.
Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer Product Flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule. ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...
Above Report by Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Do You Have an Intel Corruption Tip?
Email Me...
Time to Tell the Truth about Intel Corp.
and ALL their "Corrupt Fraternity"..
This is Not Intel Nation
this is "We the People" and Intel Corp.
is Robbing Consumers, Governments and
paying Off everyone who gets in their way...
or Worse... and this is in Many Countries..
www.InvestigativeBlogger.com
Friday, August 27, 2010
FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22? Intel Closed Door Settlements with the FTC? Intel Executive Amnesty???
"FTC in Intel Settlement Talks; before July 22?
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Please be advised this analyst is opposed to Intel closed door settlement with FTC on or before July 22; transparency being at issue.
Commissioners and discovery team know RICO, Sherman Act Section 1 and Section 2 per se violations are documented.
This analyst encourages the September hearing proceed accordingly for full disclosure, full remedies, consumer recovery which is a core value of the FTC’s charter.
Advantageously and for hearing efficiency, all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims lacking specific per se condemnation precedent, can be reviewed between the Section 1 and RICO Proofs, without fear of FTC 9341 overall case loss.
Including waste of Federal financial and manpower resource, further, that FCA has already been won on weight of evidence and is itself capable of recovering a portion, if not all, FTC 9341 litigation costs.
This analyst believes it important that every American know how to spot competition espionage occurring in the work place in real time, how to report in real time, how to resolve in real time and not over 18 year’s time as in my case.
In this continuing case of Intel Monopoly analysis, meant for FTC and DOJ discovery, leadership, error correction, law augments, inter Nation competition policy evolution, Intel Network, system and structural improvement, RICO and competition remedies and consumer recoveries.
In addition financial recovery of the economic damages for all targets harmed and pushed under by Intel Network, including in the Docket 9288 case obstruction are required under Intel’s DOJ antitrust compliance obligations.
That is for Intel and Network Executive Amnesty and or immunity from maximum antitrust and RICO damages. This would seem to include those associated with FTC Docket 9341.
I’d presume Intel is Participating in reversing the frame and fraud associated with Docket 9288 obstruction.
Alternatively in the face of a known obstruction in the administration of justice which includes witness tampering, fraudulent construction and white wash, the Docket 9341 clock could be reset to June 11, 1991.
June 11, 1991 is the inception of the Intel Insider Scheme enabling a complete Intel monopoly consumer recovery.
Pursuant to Docket 9341, I am concerned that $72 billion dollars in monopolization have been calculated.
And that the worldwide consumer recoverable from Intel tied charge back, and monopoly price of up to $42 billion, will be left un-recovered or left on the negotiating table in any FTC closed door Docket 9341 settlement.
Our knowing this fact of the consumer recoverable, legitimately, consumers are due their return from Intel and Network members.
The history of Intel class actions suggests any privately litigated consumer class action will be blown or settled on disproportionate values too harms.
This attorney opinion is supported by historical evaluation, including attorneys who would take the FCA, if not for their knowledge of the history of Intel market rigging, the various corporate political, time trap and litigation hurdles.
Intel Network adverse litigation for year’s has been sand bagged, blown, thrown and settled on minor causes with slim remedies and minor financial recovery in relation to harms. Here our countries history of private antitrust litigation ends until attorneys who would risk toughest corporate, political, legal and judicial hurdles resolves itself.
FTC and DOJ can restart that tradition of private antitrust litigation with full Intel Network disclosures, monopoly encompassing remedies and recoveries, where world wide consumer recoveries are due consumers including the Federal government.
Bursting boilers and the Federal Power, Garrison Dam Disaster and the Federal Power, Bar Pilots and the Federal Power, Finance & Securities Disaster and Federal Power, broken oil well valves and the Federal Power, broken regulatory & the Federal Power; fixing broken Intel and the Federal Power, transparently, offers the potential for one of Intel’s greatest legacies.
A cornerstone on which willing members of Bar and Bench, and corporate entities, will see and take action regulation seriously. Lacking Bar and Bench free from corporate political network control, I fear broken regulatory will remain.
A functional regulatory, Bar & Bench, are required first lines of monopoly and rackets error detection and correction.
Pursuant to FCA, I will be requesting Congress and/or President Obama please assign a Federal attorney for qui tam representation.
A case to whom I am recognized Relator and hold the U.S. Attorney recovery reward letter, having been steward for many years before and following my official Relator status.
No legitimate private attorney will take the case in the face of the market rig.
Fifth, finance and investment bankers use Quanda model, with price projection tools, to model Intel revenue and margins; like media retrospectively, to play the stock up to two years in advance.
Sixth, Intel inside individual stock traders can do the same thing as I’ve demonstrated to FTC and U.S. DOJ.
Seventh, the Intel Quanda on mass weight of use, retrospectively, extended Intel’s x86 and PC market rigs to the NASDAQ; including in relation to other exchanges.
Think about it, Intel Insider ability to play the stock of Intel and PC Dealers up to two years in advance is an extreme catalyst to rig not only individual stock prices, but the NASDAQ index itself.
The Quanda was used to rig markets;
Intel had DOJ 1st report responsibility.
Eight, combination and cartel proofs exist throughout Intel economic and system structural proofs. Structural proofs are easily deciphered from their component patterns and prove intent to monopolize per se. No other conduct proofs are required.
Nine, U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission are well aware of the Section 1 per se condemnations, Section 2 per se intent, RICO, Quanda and its reliance by Intel Network as one of their many market rigging tools.
Ten, for FTC there is no risk of Docket 9341 case loss where all Section 2 Rule of Reason claims concerning access to Intel component taper, Intel benchmark rigging, false statements to Federal procurement by Intel, Dealers and Agents concealing fraudulent and monopoly costs assessed on the Federal Government computer payment claims.
All can be heard within the bracket; Section 1 structure, Section 2 intent and RICO proofs. Please consider one of multiple proofs below:
In the RICO proof below, find partial classic Intel Xeon Tanner and Xeon Copper mine economic analysis. Playing signaling revealed by the Quanda, savvy PC Dealers were informed to stick with the quasi static equilibrium and back eddy offered by Xeon Tanner, and to avoid being washed over the falls that is Xeon Cascades.
Cascades is the Intel desktop microprocessor Copper mine 256, repackaged as a high performance Xeon server product at monopoly price premium and for dumping onto AMD. Xeon Cascades was not a high performance product and by June 2000 main board suppliers serving the broker system market, had rejected it, causing Intel to cancel its retail boxed version of the Cascade product line. Cascade’s was then left to sell through Intel primary Dealer channels.
Please note that AMD Opteron code names; Sledge Hammer and Claw Hammer, follow in response to Intel Network notice of Tanner signaling and pending Cascade predatory product dumping. Dumping is relied on by Intel a lot.
Strategically to stop current competitive product flows in channels or to make it unprofitable for competitors to enter that product category.
Full Document and Source:
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
on Top of Site...
Information by
Mike Bruzzone
Intel Case Technical Analysis since 1996
Camp Marketing Consultancy
posted Here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Got an Intel Insider Trading TIP?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel aids and abets Criminals and is involved in the Stealing of Inventions.
Bruce Sewell Flat Out Lies and Technology Media Eats it Up .. Cuz Bruce Sewell is a Big Wig at Apple.. So What.. Bruce Sewell is still involved in Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel Use to be a Big Player at Intel Corp. as Bruce Sewell was Intel Corps. General Counsel Before being Big Man on Campus over at Apple.
Bruce Sewell new Full Well about the Iviewit Inventors having their Technology Stolen and used by Intel Corp. and Bruce Sewell simply ignored this FACT. I assume that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel let APPLE know during his interview process.. what he knew.. because see Bruce Sewell wanted that Apple Job pretty bad.. and Apple . .along with Intel Corp. , Warner Bros., AOL, Sony and many other companies involved in a Massive Shareholder Fraud over the Iveiwit Stolen Patent WELL Apple stands to gain Billions over Keeping this Dirty Little Iviewit Technologies Secret. And who knows what "Payoff" or Dark Alley Deal the Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell made with Apple before he got is big ol' Apple Pay Check.
Bruce Sewell is Apple’s general counsel and Bruce Sewell is senior vice president of Legal and Government Affairs at APPLE. Bruce Sewell Reports to Apple’s CEO.
Bruce Sewell serves on the Apple's executive team and oversees all legal matters, including corporate governance, intellectual property, litigation and securities compliance, as well as government affairs.
So Bruce Sewell is a Very Big Deal at Apple and well In my Opinion because I have a Brain and Can Read, Well Bruce Sewell is Corrupt, is involved in Intellectual Property Infringements, Bruce Sewell has participated in cover up a Multi-Trillion Dollar Shareholder Fraud that involves Millions of Innocent Investors and Bruce Sewell is NO where Near One of the Good Guys as Bruce Sewell, in My Opinion STEALS PATENTS.. helps Major Companies like Intel and Apple to easily take inventors patents .. stomp on inventors rights and to raking in Billions .. paying off officials and well Business as usual in the Corrupt "Patent Theft" world of Bruce Sewell.
So we Know that Bruce Sewell left intel under some pretty odd and quick circumstances and well hush .. hush on that right. ?? and we can assume that Bruce Sewell let Apple know of his knowledge of the Iviewit Holdings, Iviewit Technologies Patent Theft and the fact that he knew Intel was using this Stolen Technology and helped them to cover it up.. See this WOULD be a Huge Asset for Corrupt Bruce Sewell to Bring To Apple as their new General Counsel Right? I mean Apple owes Iviewit Huge Royalties as Well Right. .and for over a Decade Now..
So the Apple Responds in Patentgate Bullshit your Reading.. well the TRUTH is APPLE general Council Bruce Sewell is Corrupt and there is NOTHING amiciable about HIM..
Apple Lies About "PatentGate" as Does Bruce Sewell.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=337
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997
So what is the "Real PatentGate" and What Dirty Deeds is Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel up to now with the headline of Patentgate.. ??
Got a Tip on PatentGate, or on the Corrupt Activities of D. Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel? if so Email me Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Check Out these Links for More on the Corruption of Bruce Sewell ~ Apple General Counsel...
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997
Click Here for Proof that Bruce Sewell Knew Full Well of the Iviewit Stolen Technology
Click Here for SEC Complaint Naming Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel
Also More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology at
http://www.iviewit.tv/
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/iviewit-news-story.html
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel Use to be a Big Player at Intel Corp. as Bruce Sewell was Intel Corps. General Counsel Before being Big Man on Campus over at Apple.
Bruce Sewell new Full Well about the Iviewit Inventors having their Technology Stolen and used by Intel Corp. and Bruce Sewell simply ignored this FACT. I assume that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel let APPLE know during his interview process.. what he knew.. because see Bruce Sewell wanted that Apple Job pretty bad.. and Apple . .along with Intel Corp. , Warner Bros., AOL, Sony and many other companies involved in a Massive Shareholder Fraud over the Iveiwit Stolen Patent WELL Apple stands to gain Billions over Keeping this Dirty Little Iviewit Technologies Secret. And who knows what "Payoff" or Dark Alley Deal the Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell made with Apple before he got is big ol' Apple Pay Check.
Bruce Sewell is Apple’s general counsel and Bruce Sewell is senior vice president of Legal and Government Affairs at APPLE. Bruce Sewell Reports to Apple’s CEO.
Bruce Sewell serves on the Apple's executive team and oversees all legal matters, including corporate governance, intellectual property, litigation and securities compliance, as well as government affairs.
So Bruce Sewell is a Very Big Deal at Apple and well In my Opinion because I have a Brain and Can Read, Well Bruce Sewell is Corrupt, is involved in Intellectual Property Infringements, Bruce Sewell has participated in cover up a Multi-Trillion Dollar Shareholder Fraud that involves Millions of Innocent Investors and Bruce Sewell is NO where Near One of the Good Guys as Bruce Sewell, in My Opinion STEALS PATENTS.. helps Major Companies like Intel and Apple to easily take inventors patents .. stomp on inventors rights and to raking in Billions .. paying off officials and well Business as usual in the Corrupt "Patent Theft" world of Bruce Sewell.
So we Know that Bruce Sewell left intel under some pretty odd and quick circumstances and well hush .. hush on that right. ?? and we can assume that Bruce Sewell let Apple know of his knowledge of the Iviewit Holdings, Iviewit Technologies Patent Theft and the fact that he knew Intel was using this Stolen Technology and helped them to cover it up.. See this WOULD be a Huge Asset for Corrupt Bruce Sewell to Bring To Apple as their new General Counsel Right? I mean Apple owes Iviewit Huge Royalties as Well Right. .and for over a Decade Now..
So the Apple Responds in Patentgate Bullshit your Reading.. well the TRUTH is APPLE general Council Bruce Sewell is Corrupt and there is NOTHING amiciable about HIM..
Apple Lies About "PatentGate" as Does Bruce Sewell.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=337
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997
So what is the "Real PatentGate" and What Dirty Deeds is Bruce Sewell, Apple General Counsel up to now with the headline of Patentgate.. ??
Got a Tip on PatentGate, or on the Corrupt Activities of D. Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel? if so Email me Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Check Out these Links for More on the Corruption of Bruce Sewell ~ Apple General Counsel...
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1597997
Click Here for Proof that Bruce Sewell Knew Full Well of the Iviewit Stolen Technology
Click Here for SEC Complaint Naming Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel
Also More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology at
http://www.iviewit.tv/
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/iviewit-news-story.html
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Friday, June 25, 2010
Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America Blatantly IGNORES Massive Shareholder Fraud
Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America received the Following on Tuesday, May 05, 2009 - and SONY Shareholders and Liability Carriers NEED to ask why Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America has Yet to Advice Shareholders or Do Right by Iviewit Technologies in order to Disclose this Massive Shareholder Fraud as Well as Too start working on a Solution to this Mult-Trillion Dollar Liability.
" Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq.
Senior Corporate Counsel
Sony Corporation of America
550 Madison Avenue
27th Floor
New York, NY 10022
212-833-5223
Email: kenneth_weissman@sonyusa.com
Re: Long Term Business Opportunity,
Notice of Infringement and Cease and Desist
Dear Mr. Weissman,
It was a pleasure speaking by phone on April 30, 2009 and per our conversation, I
look forward to hearing from the appropriate person within Sony that you are notifying of
our conversation, in the very near future.
In the meantime, please forward any and all inquiries or information requests to my contact information below.
While I certainly look forward to re-establishing positive business relations and working out a long term strategic business relationship with Sony, as indicated this is an Intellectual Property infringement matter, which involves the infringement of my Intellectual Property rights since 1998.
I also have notified you of a federal lawsuit that Sony is a part of, currently at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the many lawsuits and legal actions that are anticipated in the near future.
The litigation was marked legally "related" to a federal Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, which by recent Order of US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin is being scheduled for a public Trial with a Scheduling Conference to be held in that case on May 8, 2009.
More importantly, my Intellectual Properties at issue herein have been valued at over a
Trillion dollars over the life of the IP and the lawsuit is for 12 counts at one trillion each.
Notes:
1 http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html
2 http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/anderson-advances-federal-jury-to-hear.html
With that history in mind and with a view toward positive long-term business
relations with Sony, I am providing 72 business hours Notice to Sony America to make
an initial good faith deposit of $10 Million dollars in an account to be provided as an
initial Agreement to agree to a long-term royalty and licensing payment arrangement.
As you are or should be aware at this time, Sony America is a named Defendant in my
Amended Complaint (3) as part of the MPEGLA LLC patent pool and a licensor of same.
US Judge Shira Scheindlin who is hearing the Trial of the Related Anderson case
has declared my RICO case to also be a "murder" case, although I only alleged
Attempted Murder after the Car bombing of my family's mini-van in Boynton Beach
several years ago.
Full pictorial evidence of the car bombing may be found at my website
at www.iviewit.tv along with a wealth of information documenting these affairs since the
inception, including a Link to a February 2009 Petition to the Honorable President
Barack Hussein Obama II. and The Honorable United States Attorney General Eric H.
Holder Jr. (4) and others.
Thus, this is a limited time opportunity to begin attempting to aid Sony out of
both the infringement issues and the civil complaint on more favorable business terms, if possible and begin business relations with myself as the true and proper inventor of video
and image scaling technologies used by Sony.
I have also included reference to the Intellectual Property filings below and the federal lawsuit and related cases.
At the expiration of the 72-hour Notice, which shall commence on Tuesday, May
05, 2009 at 5:00pm US Eastern, unless there has been completed arrangements for the good faith deposit of Ten Million Dollars (US $10,000,000.00) as part of this Agreement to agree, Sony America shall Cease and Desist any and all uses of the Intellectual Properties herein and learned through agreement with my former companies Iviewit.
Further infringement will seek elevated costs in the nature of treble damages for willful
infringement and less favorable terms than presently offered for this limited time
Agreement to Agree.
Additionally, I have attached letter complaints to the US Securities and Exchange
Commission ( SEC ) regarding some of the other named Defendants in the lawsuit such
3 http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
4 http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
Also involved are Intel, Lockheed Martin and Silicon Graphics, Inc. for violations of FASB No. 5 and related accounting and reporting requirements, which shows part of the direct course of action that will be taken for failure to make sound business choices by entering into
negotiations for this long term business and licensing agreement by making the good
faith $10,000,000.00 deposit.
As further mentioned, Sony was under NDA and other agreements both signed
and in the drafting phase at the time of discovery of the crimes regarding using the
technology in the MovieLink (seven studio download/streaming) project, across all Sony
websites and other uses for various hardware and software applications.
Some of the law firms involved at the time were Irell & Manella LLP and Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.
Thus, we would anticipate a deal with Sony that would remunerate for past uses and pay royalties going forward and as a long-term partner with the true and proper inventors going forward.
Per your request, listed below are some of the key Sony executives involved with
me and my companies:
Yair Landau, President @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Howard Stringer, Chairman @ Sony 550 Digital Media Ventures, a Sony Group Company
Thomas Daniel 'Tommy' Mottola, President & Chief Executive Officer @ Sony
Music Entertainment Inc. (referred by Doc McGhee, brother to Iviewit inventor Patricia
Daniels)
James L. Honoré, Executive Vice President Post Production @ Columbia Tristar
Motion Picture Group a Sony Pictures Entertainment Company
Douglas Chey, Divisional CIO of Motion Pictures and Television @ Sony
Pictures Digital Entertainment (originally learned of my inventions prior to Sony at AOLTW/WB)
Corii Berg, Senior Vice President Business Affairs @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Patrick Kennedy @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Geoffrey Springer, Director of Technology Agency @ Sony Pictures Digital
Entertainment
Satoshi Tanimoto, Director, Technology Integration Broadband Development @
Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Michael Arietta, Vice President for Business Development @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Anne E. Crawford, Paralegal, Business Affairs Sony Pictures Digital
Entertainment @ Sony Pictures Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Don Levy, Vice President Marketing & Communications @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Timothy Chambers, Director of Production and Technology @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division/Columbia-Tristar Interactive
Audrey Marco, Vice President and General Manager @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
The Amended Complaint in the federal lawsuit of which Sony is a named
Defendant through MPEGLA LLC is referenced by the following Docket Nos:
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1. (08-4873-cv) - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
US District Court - Southern District NY
2. (07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary
Committee, et al.
Legally related cases by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin:
3. (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER
LAWSUIT going to Trial
4. (07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
5. (08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et
al.
6. (08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
7. (08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.
8. (08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
9. (08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
10. (08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
11. () John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York.
Thus, I look forward to a prompt and timely response so that
we may move forward in positive relations.
Respectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein ""
Source:
www.Iviewit.TV
Looks to Me Like Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America had a way out ... Looks like Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America had a chance over a year ago to STOP the Maddness and begin to find a Solution to the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Liability that the Iviewit Infringement brings to SONY.
And Well it seems that Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America HAS not done the "right thing" and Now we have another Year and Billions.. more dollars piled on to the Blatant Infringement of the Iviewit Technologies and SONY has known of this Issue for a VERY long Time..
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.CEOPaulOtellini.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.ProskauerSucks.com
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
" Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq.
Senior Corporate Counsel
Sony Corporation of America
550 Madison Avenue
27th Floor
New York, NY 10022
212-833-5223
Email: kenneth_weissman@sonyusa.com
Re: Long Term Business Opportunity,
Notice of Infringement and Cease and Desist
Dear Mr. Weissman,
It was a pleasure speaking by phone on April 30, 2009 and per our conversation, I
look forward to hearing from the appropriate person within Sony that you are notifying of
our conversation, in the very near future.
In the meantime, please forward any and all inquiries or information requests to my contact information below.
While I certainly look forward to re-establishing positive business relations and working out a long term strategic business relationship with Sony, as indicated this is an Intellectual Property infringement matter, which involves the infringement of my Intellectual Property rights since 1998.
I also have notified you of a federal lawsuit that Sony is a part of, currently at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the many lawsuits and legal actions that are anticipated in the near future.
The litigation was marked legally "related" to a federal Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson, which by recent Order of US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin is being scheduled for a public Trial with a Scheduling Conference to be held in that case on May 8, 2009.
More importantly, my Intellectual Properties at issue herein have been valued at over a
Trillion dollars over the life of the IP and the lawsuit is for 12 counts at one trillion each.
Notes:
1 http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html
2 http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/anderson-advances-federal-jury-to-hear.html
With that history in mind and with a view toward positive long-term business
relations with Sony, I am providing 72 business hours Notice to Sony America to make
an initial good faith deposit of $10 Million dollars in an account to be provided as an
initial Agreement to agree to a long-term royalty and licensing payment arrangement.
As you are or should be aware at this time, Sony America is a named Defendant in my
Amended Complaint (3) as part of the MPEGLA LLC patent pool and a licensor of same.
US Judge Shira Scheindlin who is hearing the Trial of the Related Anderson case
has declared my RICO case to also be a "murder" case, although I only alleged
Attempted Murder after the Car bombing of my family's mini-van in Boynton Beach
several years ago.
Full pictorial evidence of the car bombing may be found at my website
at www.iviewit.tv along with a wealth of information documenting these affairs since the
inception, including a Link to a February 2009 Petition to the Honorable President
Barack Hussein Obama II. and The Honorable United States Attorney General Eric H.
Holder Jr. (4) and others.
Thus, this is a limited time opportunity to begin attempting to aid Sony out of
both the infringement issues and the civil complaint on more favorable business terms, if possible and begin business relations with myself as the true and proper inventor of video
and image scaling technologies used by Sony.
I have also included reference to the Intellectual Property filings below and the federal lawsuit and related cases.
At the expiration of the 72-hour Notice, which shall commence on Tuesday, May
05, 2009 at 5:00pm US Eastern, unless there has been completed arrangements for the good faith deposit of Ten Million Dollars (US $10,000,000.00) as part of this Agreement to agree, Sony America shall Cease and Desist any and all uses of the Intellectual Properties herein and learned through agreement with my former companies Iviewit.
Further infringement will seek elevated costs in the nature of treble damages for willful
infringement and less favorable terms than presently offered for this limited time
Agreement to Agree.
Additionally, I have attached letter complaints to the US Securities and Exchange
Commission ( SEC ) regarding some of the other named Defendants in the lawsuit such
3 http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
4 http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
Also involved are Intel, Lockheed Martin and Silicon Graphics, Inc. for violations of FASB No. 5 and related accounting and reporting requirements, which shows part of the direct course of action that will be taken for failure to make sound business choices by entering into
negotiations for this long term business and licensing agreement by making the good
faith $10,000,000.00 deposit.
As further mentioned, Sony was under NDA and other agreements both signed
and in the drafting phase at the time of discovery of the crimes regarding using the
technology in the MovieLink (seven studio download/streaming) project, across all Sony
websites and other uses for various hardware and software applications.
Some of the law firms involved at the time were Irell & Manella LLP and Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.
Thus, we would anticipate a deal with Sony that would remunerate for past uses and pay royalties going forward and as a long-term partner with the true and proper inventors going forward.
Per your request, listed below are some of the key Sony executives involved with
me and my companies:
Yair Landau, President @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Howard Stringer, Chairman @ Sony 550 Digital Media Ventures, a Sony Group Company
Thomas Daniel 'Tommy' Mottola, President & Chief Executive Officer @ Sony
Music Entertainment Inc. (referred by Doc McGhee, brother to Iviewit inventor Patricia
Daniels)
James L. Honoré, Executive Vice President Post Production @ Columbia Tristar
Motion Picture Group a Sony Pictures Entertainment Company
Douglas Chey, Divisional CIO of Motion Pictures and Television @ Sony
Pictures Digital Entertainment (originally learned of my inventions prior to Sony at AOLTW/WB)
Corii Berg, Senior Vice President Business Affairs @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Patrick Kennedy @ Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Geoffrey Springer, Director of Technology Agency @ Sony Pictures Digital
Entertainment
Satoshi Tanimoto, Director, Technology Integration Broadband Development @
Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment
Michael Arietta, Vice President for Business Development @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Anne E. Crawford, Paralegal, Business Affairs Sony Pictures Digital
Entertainment @ Sony Pictures Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Don Levy, Vice President Marketing & Communications @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
Timothy Chambers, Director of Production and Technology @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division/Columbia-Tristar Interactive
Audrey Marco, Vice President and General Manager @ Sony Pictures
Entertainment - Digital Studios Division
The Amended Complaint in the federal lawsuit of which Sony is a named
Defendant through MPEGLA LLC is referenced by the following Docket Nos:
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1. (08-4873-cv) - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
US District Court - Southern District NY
2. (07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary
Committee, et al.
Legally related cases by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin:
3. (07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER
LAWSUIT going to Trial
4. (07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
5. (08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et
al.
6. (08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
7. (08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.
8. (08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
9. (08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
10. (08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
11. () John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York.
Thus, I look forward to a prompt and timely response so that
we may move forward in positive relations.
Respectfully Yours,
Eliot I. Bernstein ""
Source:
www.Iviewit.TV
Looks to Me Like Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America had a way out ... Looks like Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America had a chance over a year ago to STOP the Maddness and begin to find a Solution to the Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Liability that the Iviewit Infringement brings to SONY.
And Well it seems that Kenneth I. Weissman, Esq. - Senior Corporate Counsel - Sony Corporation of America HAS not done the "right thing" and Now we have another Year and Billions.. more dollars piled on to the Blatant Infringement of the Iviewit Technologies and SONY has known of this Issue for a VERY long Time..
More on the Iviewit Stolen Technology
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.CEOPaulOtellini.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.ProskauerSucks.com
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney at Proskauer Rose Law Firm CONSPIRES with MPEG LA to Commit Massive Fraud and Anti-Trust Violations
MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs. Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose DOES it Again...
MPEG LA has been in the Illegal - Unethical
Patent Pooling Business for Years.
Proskauer Rose Law Firm has made a Living and Lifetime Business of Billion Dollar Corruption Schemes and screwing over investors. And Well Proskauer Rose's Patent Department has a Billion Dollar Patent Pooling Scheme going on with the help of Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein and the Illegal, Secret Patent Pool technology Stealing Schemes of MPEG LA.
Corrupt Law Firm ... Proskauer Rose Corrupt Law Firm...
MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs - MPEG LA is Corrupt, it is my understand that MPEG LA Stole a Trillion Dollar Patent with the Aid of Corrupt Law Firms, Tech Companies, Patent Attorneys and Executives
"MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs
German software maker Nero has filed an antitrust complaint against MPEG-LA, the company that oversees licensing for the H.264 video codec favoured by Microsoft and Apple.
MPEG-LA (MPEG Licensing Authority) controls the licenses for the pools of patents needed to use the MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and AVC/H.264 video standards.
As such, it collects royalties from the sale or distribution of almost every PC, DVD, DVD player, digital TV set, TV set-top box, still camera, video camera, iPhone and BlackBerry in the world.
Nero, best known for its CD burning software, alleges that MPEG-LA abuses its monopoly power in these technology markets.
The company filed its antitrust complaint in California district court in Los Angeles on 14 May, seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction to halt the alleged anti-competitive actions.
"Absolute power has corrupted MPEG-LA absolutely,"
Nero maintained in its complaint.
"Once MPEG-LA obtained monopoly power in the relevant technology markets, it used that power to wilfully maintain or extend its monopolies for years beyond their natural expiration... and administer its licences in an unfair, unreasonable, and discriminatory manner that stifles competition and innovation, and harms consumers."
MPEG-LA charges licensees different amounts for the same MPEG-2 patent, collects administration fees and royalties multiple times for the same device, and does not communicate its policies adequately to certain licensees, according to Nero.
"By remaining silent on vital aspects of its licensing programs, MPEG-LA has created a system that favours some licensees, such as insiders (ie, licensors), and disfavours others, such as outsiders (ie, non-licensor licensees)," Nero's complaint read.
"As a result, outsiders such as Nero have great difficulty planning technology changes and embarking on programmes to research, develop and implement technological innovations — and are charged supracompetitive royalties on distributions as to which they never agreed to pay royalties — while other licensees, such as insiders, do not face such problems."
According to Nero's complaint, MPEG-LA only obtained monopoly power in the relevant audio and video codec markets after getting assurances in 1997 that the Department of Justice (DoJ) would not launch antitrust proceedings against it.
These assurances were conditional on patent pools not being used to stifle competition, Nero stated. It added that MPEG-LA suggested to the DoJ at the time that the pool for MPEG-2 contained no more than 53 essential patents.
MPEG-LA subsequently added around 800 patents it deemed to be essential to the MPEG-2 pool, so as to extend the duration of the codec's licence, Nero said.
The company did the same thing with the MPEG-4 pool, which now includes more than 1,000 patents, and the AVC/H.264 pool, now with over 1,300 patents, according to the filing.
AVC/H.264 is the video codec of choice for Microsoft, which will support it natively in Internet Explorer 9, and for Apple, which is backing it as a superior alternative to Flash.
While Google also supports H.264 in Chrome, it recently open-sourced its own alternative, VP8, in a bid to provide a free alternative to the proprietary and paid-for H.264.
As part of its complaint, Nero said that MPEG-LA used its own patent counsel, Kenneth Rubenstein, as "a so-called 'independent' expert" to evaluate the essentiality of patents.
MPEG-LA had not responded at the time of writing to a request on Tuesday for comment on Nero's allegations. The next stage in the case will be for MPEG-LA to answer Nero's complaint. ""
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2010/05/25/mpeg-la-hit-by-antitrust-suit-over-video-codecs-40089042/
Lets See How German Tech Companies Handle the Corrupt,
UnEthical and Illegal Behavior of MPEG LA....
Ok so a Decade after Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose Law Firm Patent Attorney, helped MPEG LA to steal the Holy Grail of Video / Technology inventions in which we all use every day and have for years upon years, well now this same Corrupt Patent Attorney is involved in more patent theft and illegal patent pool... why is Proskauer Rose standing with Kenneth Rubenstein?
I mean Christopher Wheeler was involved in this stolen patent and he was pushed out.. Kenneth Rubenstein was not even at Proskauer Rose when he first started his patent theft FOR MPEG LA to illegally pool the iviewit technologies in patent pools to hide their existence.. then Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose hired Kenneth Rubenstein after he already lied to the Iviewit Company and said that he was with Proskauer Rose.. so Corrupt Law Firm - Proskauer Rose must be getting billions from MPEG LA dirty dealings or they would not have harbored a CRIMINAL for so long.. also see.. Proskauer ROSE was the reason for the Fall of Enron with this patent .. this technology theft.. and no accountable?
Well that day has come... Unless of Course Corrupt Proskauer Rose also owns judges, ethics committees, supreme courts, and patent officials in Germany as Well as the US?
I will discuss a WHOLE lot more about MPEG LA, Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer ROSE and the Horrible Injustice, Flat Out Fraud, Shareholder Deception, and more that surrounds MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney STEALING a Trillion Dollar Technology and Illegally Pooling this Technology in MPEG patent Pools.. all orchestrated by ONE very Corrupt Patent attorney Kenneth Rubenstein..
PS don't forget.. MPEG and APPLE are seeming quite cozy and Bruce Sewell knew about Iviewit .. while at Intel and when informed went to APPLE.. more on that later..
Collecting Royalties from Stolen Technologies and Illegal Patent Pooling,
What an Incredible Racket... Billions hand over Fist on Someone Else's Invention .. and many of these inventors are harassed, bankrupted, their cars bombed and well just plain ol' SHUT Up..
Here are some Sites for more information in the iViewit Stolen Technology and the Illegal Patent Pooling Tricks and Schemes at MPEG LA with the Help of Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that has created Massive Shareholder Fraud that is now a High Profile SEC Complaint and a Federal RICO Lawsuit .. still undisclosed to unsuspecting shareholders of IBM, Intel Corp, AOL, Time Warner Inc. , Lockheed Martin, Warner Bros. , SGI, and More involved in the Blatant Theft of a Trillion Dollar Technology that We all used Every Day...
www.Iviewit.TV
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ProskauerSucks.com
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.BruceSewell.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
Proskauer Rose bio Clip on Kenneth Rubenstein"
" Kenneth Rubenstein is co-head of the Patent Law Group and a Partner in the New York office. He also is a registered patent attorney before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office and a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. While there are numerous patent law groups at various firms, Ken and his group distinguish themselves from competitors by being able to deal with very sophisticated technology. "
Source
http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/Detail.aspx?professional=0eae1af8-e822-4a75-9414-d8ee3f87e890&tabId=0
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
more on the MPEG LA stealing and pooling patents
.. at www.iViewit.tv/
and at www.DeniedPatent.com
MPEG LA has been in the Illegal - Unethical
Patent Pooling Business for Years.
Proskauer Rose Law Firm has made a Living and Lifetime Business of Billion Dollar Corruption Schemes and screwing over investors. And Well Proskauer Rose's Patent Department has a Billion Dollar Patent Pooling Scheme going on with the help of Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein and the Illegal, Secret Patent Pool technology Stealing Schemes of MPEG LA.
Corrupt Law Firm ... Proskauer Rose Corrupt Law Firm...
MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs - MPEG LA is Corrupt, it is my understand that MPEG LA Stole a Trillion Dollar Patent with the Aid of Corrupt Law Firms, Tech Companies, Patent Attorneys and Executives
"MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs
German software maker Nero has filed an antitrust complaint against MPEG-LA, the company that oversees licensing for the H.264 video codec favoured by Microsoft and Apple.
MPEG-LA (MPEG Licensing Authority) controls the licenses for the pools of patents needed to use the MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and AVC/H.264 video standards.
As such, it collects royalties from the sale or distribution of almost every PC, DVD, DVD player, digital TV set, TV set-top box, still camera, video camera, iPhone and BlackBerry in the world.
Nero, best known for its CD burning software, alleges that MPEG-LA abuses its monopoly power in these technology markets.
The company filed its antitrust complaint in California district court in Los Angeles on 14 May, seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction to halt the alleged anti-competitive actions.
"Absolute power has corrupted MPEG-LA absolutely,"
Nero maintained in its complaint.
"Once MPEG-LA obtained monopoly power in the relevant technology markets, it used that power to wilfully maintain or extend its monopolies for years beyond their natural expiration... and administer its licences in an unfair, unreasonable, and discriminatory manner that stifles competition and innovation, and harms consumers."
MPEG-LA charges licensees different amounts for the same MPEG-2 patent, collects administration fees and royalties multiple times for the same device, and does not communicate its policies adequately to certain licensees, according to Nero.
"By remaining silent on vital aspects of its licensing programs, MPEG-LA has created a system that favours some licensees, such as insiders (ie, licensors), and disfavours others, such as outsiders (ie, non-licensor licensees)," Nero's complaint read.
"As a result, outsiders such as Nero have great difficulty planning technology changes and embarking on programmes to research, develop and implement technological innovations — and are charged supracompetitive royalties on distributions as to which they never agreed to pay royalties — while other licensees, such as insiders, do not face such problems."
According to Nero's complaint, MPEG-LA only obtained monopoly power in the relevant audio and video codec markets after getting assurances in 1997 that the Department of Justice (DoJ) would not launch antitrust proceedings against it.
These assurances were conditional on patent pools not being used to stifle competition, Nero stated. It added that MPEG-LA suggested to the DoJ at the time that the pool for MPEG-2 contained no more than 53 essential patents.
MPEG-LA subsequently added around 800 patents it deemed to be essential to the MPEG-2 pool, so as to extend the duration of the codec's licence, Nero said.
The company did the same thing with the MPEG-4 pool, which now includes more than 1,000 patents, and the AVC/H.264 pool, now with over 1,300 patents, according to the filing.
AVC/H.264 is the video codec of choice for Microsoft, which will support it natively in Internet Explorer 9, and for Apple, which is backing it as a superior alternative to Flash.
While Google also supports H.264 in Chrome, it recently open-sourced its own alternative, VP8, in a bid to provide a free alternative to the proprietary and paid-for H.264.
As part of its complaint, Nero said that MPEG-LA used its own patent counsel, Kenneth Rubenstein, as "a so-called 'independent' expert" to evaluate the essentiality of patents.
MPEG-LA had not responded at the time of writing to a request on Tuesday for comment on Nero's allegations. The next stage in the case will be for MPEG-LA to answer Nero's complaint. ""
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2010/05/25/mpeg-la-hit-by-antitrust-suit-over-video-codecs-40089042/
Lets See How German Tech Companies Handle the Corrupt,
UnEthical and Illegal Behavior of MPEG LA....
Ok so a Decade after Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose Law Firm Patent Attorney, helped MPEG LA to steal the Holy Grail of Video / Technology inventions in which we all use every day and have for years upon years, well now this same Corrupt Patent Attorney is involved in more patent theft and illegal patent pool... why is Proskauer Rose standing with Kenneth Rubenstein?
I mean Christopher Wheeler was involved in this stolen patent and he was pushed out.. Kenneth Rubenstein was not even at Proskauer Rose when he first started his patent theft FOR MPEG LA to illegally pool the iviewit technologies in patent pools to hide their existence.. then Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose hired Kenneth Rubenstein after he already lied to the Iviewit Company and said that he was with Proskauer Rose.. so Corrupt Law Firm - Proskauer Rose must be getting billions from MPEG LA dirty dealings or they would not have harbored a CRIMINAL for so long.. also see.. Proskauer ROSE was the reason for the Fall of Enron with this patent .. this technology theft.. and no accountable?
Well that day has come... Unless of Course Corrupt Proskauer Rose also owns judges, ethics committees, supreme courts, and patent officials in Germany as Well as the US?
I will discuss a WHOLE lot more about MPEG LA, Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer ROSE and the Horrible Injustice, Flat Out Fraud, Shareholder Deception, and more that surrounds MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney STEALING a Trillion Dollar Technology and Illegally Pooling this Technology in MPEG patent Pools.. all orchestrated by ONE very Corrupt Patent attorney Kenneth Rubenstein..
PS don't forget.. MPEG and APPLE are seeming quite cozy and Bruce Sewell knew about Iviewit .. while at Intel and when informed went to APPLE.. more on that later..
Collecting Royalties from Stolen Technologies and Illegal Patent Pooling,
What an Incredible Racket... Billions hand over Fist on Someone Else's Invention .. and many of these inventors are harassed, bankrupted, their cars bombed and well just plain ol' SHUT Up..
Here are some Sites for more information in the iViewit Stolen Technology and the Illegal Patent Pooling Tricks and Schemes at MPEG LA with the Help of Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that has created Massive Shareholder Fraud that is now a High Profile SEC Complaint and a Federal RICO Lawsuit .. still undisclosed to unsuspecting shareholders of IBM, Intel Corp, AOL, Time Warner Inc. , Lockheed Martin, Warner Bros. , SGI, and More involved in the Blatant Theft of a Trillion Dollar Technology that We all used Every Day...
www.Iviewit.TV
www.DeniedPatent.com
www.ProskauerSucks.com
www.KennethRubenstein.com
www.BruceSewell.com
www.JeffreyBewkes.com
www.CEOpaulOtellini.com
Proskauer Rose bio Clip on Kenneth Rubenstein"
" Kenneth Rubenstein is co-head of the Patent Law Group and a Partner in the New York office. He also is a registered patent attorney before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office and a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. While there are numerous patent law groups at various firms, Ken and his group distinguish themselves from competitors by being able to deal with very sophisticated technology. "
Source
http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/Detail.aspx?professional=0eae1af8-e822-4a75-9414-d8ee3f87e890&tabId=0
posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
more on the MPEG LA stealing and pooling patents
.. at www.iViewit.tv/
and at www.DeniedPatent.com
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Julie Jacobs is the New General Counsel at AOL Inc. - Was Julie Jacobs General Counsel at AOL Inc. Told about the Massive Shareholder Fraud?
Julie Jacobs is the New General Counsel at AOL Inc.
Did the Corrupt General Counsel of AOL Inc. IRA Parker disclose to the New AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs the incredible liability that she was and well did walk into with now being general counsel to a company that will soon be involved in billions in lawsuits, fraud, criminal complaints, sec investigations and that the AOL Shareholders are now involved in something so massive there may even be rescissionary rights and there will be HUGE financial losses to the AOL Inc. shareholers.. there is no way around it and Ira Parker has known for a VERY Long time..
This Massive Shareholder Fraud existed BEFORE AOL split from Time Warner Inc. and it was not disclosed to the SEC - to Shareholders - to Insurance Providers as far as I know.
The Truth.. the Facts are obvious and easily proven.. the question is how long can AOL - Time Warner Inc. - Warner Bros. keep paying off whatever judge - attorney - SEC officer - Patent officer that they seem to have been paying to hide all this.. how long can this really keep going.. ??
It has been a decade and in this.. well Shareholders have be frauded, duped and will suffer HUGE financial loss soon - the CEOs - General Counsel's - and Law Firms Involved, well they too will suffer HUGE financial loss but also Criminal Charges, SEC Charges, RICO Complaints and more.. for their Obvious - Blatant and Easily Proven Crimes against Shareholders and the Owners .. Investors and Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Company.
AOL Inc. is Liable for a large part of a Trillion Dollar Liability and well what Will AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs do about it? Maybe AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs will get started on the right foot and immediatley review all related facts, documents and IMMEDIATELY alert the SEC, the AOL shareholders and put an end to the liability that is piling up against the AOL shareholders.
Question is Did the Corrupt General Counsel of AOL Inc. IRA Parker disclose to the New AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs that AOL was involved in a RICO Lawsuit, an SEC Complaint and that there was over 1200 documents of Proof of this Fraud - Corruption and Liability at the Iviewit Technologies homepage www.Iviewit.TV ???
Did Ira Parker disclose all he knew about the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent and what that liability would mean to AOL shareholders and AOL Inc. in general? I mean surely Ira Parker disclosed this and did not just take his stocks and runnnnnn... !!!! Right???
Julie Jacobs, AOL general Counsel is now taking on a HUGE Liability .. question is was it disclosed to her before she signed on for this new job as AOL Inc. General Counsel?
If Julie Jacobs - AOL Inc. General Counsel knew about this Massive Shareholder Fraud and signed on anyway, well then she must have connections that are pretty high up and know that she will be Teflon in this Iviewit Shit Storm.
And if for Some Reason Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel did not know about the Massive Shareholder Fraud against AOL Shareholders involving the Iviewit Stolen Technlogies - well then .. come on .. how could this be.. can she Google?
The Truth is everywhere Online.. if Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel did any due diligence what so ever before taking the job as AOL Inc. General Counsel - well then Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would easily have seen and been able to prove to herself the Truth and Validity of the Trillion Dollar Liability that Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent brings to the Technology Industry and Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would have been able to see what role the AOL Shareholders would be facing and Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would have seen the Timeline in which all of this Fraud on the AOL shareholders was committed.. way back before the Split.. with Time Warner.. and surely Julie Jacobs - AOL knows what this means..
so Did Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel Do her Homework before signing on as AOL Inc. General Counsel ? Ok well maybe Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel does not get this Internet Thing, maybe Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel simply discredits Blogs and Websites as Hoop La and not to be Taken Seriously.. or ....???
Well at Anyrate.. Someone at AOL surely can "Google" and well surely will bring this post to her attention and well Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel - Now you Know... You have Stepped into a Pile of Iviewit Scat that you will not easily Climb Out of ... Good Luck to You.. You can bet that I will be watching to See how you are handling this Most Amazing.. this Massive - Major.. Huge ..and well the Biggest Financial Issue of your Entire Career.
Ira Parker - Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Research Links
NOTICE:
Julie Jacobs - AOL Inc. General Counsel:
NOW you KNOW !!!
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100108%20Letter%20to%20Tim%20Armstrong%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20091231%20Jerry%20McKinley%20AOL%20Inc%20letter%20Re%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20response.pdf
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/2010/02/ira-parker-general-counsel-and.html
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Iviewit SEC Complaint Naming Ira Parker - AOL
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
www.DeniedPatent.com
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://www.matthewtriggs.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-agreements-with.html
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/p/warner-bros-aol-major-shareholder.html
Also this Press Release
"Iviewit Press Release: World Renowned Inventor of Internet Video and Image Scaling Formulae Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI CRIMINAL Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose (Christopher Wheeler), Foley &; Lardner for Patent Theft, a car bombing and more. Read all about it @
Online Interactive Version of Press Release @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288
Hard Copy of the Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
Got a Tip on Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel ?
Got an Inside Story .. Dirt.. the Scoop on Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel ?
Well if So email Me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com and Let's Get Justice for the AOL Shareholders, the Iviewit Inventors, the Iviewit Investors and in Turn the "We the People".
Surely CEO Tim Armstrong has informed Julie Jacobs of what she is taking on? Or possibly being around the AOL company since 2000 - maybe Julie Jacobs knows full well of the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent and is part of the Corruption, Cover up and Massive Shareholder Fraud..
posted here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Did the Corrupt General Counsel of AOL Inc. IRA Parker disclose to the New AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs the incredible liability that she was and well did walk into with now being general counsel to a company that will soon be involved in billions in lawsuits, fraud, criminal complaints, sec investigations and that the AOL Shareholders are now involved in something so massive there may even be rescissionary rights and there will be HUGE financial losses to the AOL Inc. shareholers.. there is no way around it and Ira Parker has known for a VERY Long time..
This Massive Shareholder Fraud existed BEFORE AOL split from Time Warner Inc. and it was not disclosed to the SEC - to Shareholders - to Insurance Providers as far as I know.
The Truth.. the Facts are obvious and easily proven.. the question is how long can AOL - Time Warner Inc. - Warner Bros. keep paying off whatever judge - attorney - SEC officer - Patent officer that they seem to have been paying to hide all this.. how long can this really keep going.. ??
It has been a decade and in this.. well Shareholders have be frauded, duped and will suffer HUGE financial loss soon - the CEOs - General Counsel's - and Law Firms Involved, well they too will suffer HUGE financial loss but also Criminal Charges, SEC Charges, RICO Complaints and more.. for their Obvious - Blatant and Easily Proven Crimes against Shareholders and the Owners .. Investors and Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Company.
AOL Inc. is Liable for a large part of a Trillion Dollar Liability and well what Will AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs do about it? Maybe AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs will get started on the right foot and immediatley review all related facts, documents and IMMEDIATELY alert the SEC, the AOL shareholders and put an end to the liability that is piling up against the AOL shareholders.
Question is Did the Corrupt General Counsel of AOL Inc. IRA Parker disclose to the New AOL Inc.General Counsel Julie Jacobs that AOL was involved in a RICO Lawsuit, an SEC Complaint and that there was over 1200 documents of Proof of this Fraud - Corruption and Liability at the Iviewit Technologies homepage www.Iviewit.TV ???
Did Ira Parker disclose all he knew about the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent and what that liability would mean to AOL shareholders and AOL Inc. in general? I mean surely Ira Parker disclosed this and did not just take his stocks and runnnnnn... !!!! Right???
Julie Jacobs, AOL general Counsel is now taking on a HUGE Liability .. question is was it disclosed to her before she signed on for this new job as AOL Inc. General Counsel?
If Julie Jacobs - AOL Inc. General Counsel knew about this Massive Shareholder Fraud and signed on anyway, well then she must have connections that are pretty high up and know that she will be Teflon in this Iviewit Shit Storm.
And if for Some Reason Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel did not know about the Massive Shareholder Fraud against AOL Shareholders involving the Iviewit Stolen Technlogies - well then .. come on .. how could this be.. can she Google?
The Truth is everywhere Online.. if Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel did any due diligence what so ever before taking the job as AOL Inc. General Counsel - well then Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would easily have seen and been able to prove to herself the Truth and Validity of the Trillion Dollar Liability that Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent brings to the Technology Industry and Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would have been able to see what role the AOL Shareholders would be facing and Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel would have seen the Timeline in which all of this Fraud on the AOL shareholders was committed.. way back before the Split.. with Time Warner.. and surely Julie Jacobs - AOL knows what this means..
so Did Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel Do her Homework before signing on as AOL Inc. General Counsel ? Ok well maybe Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel does not get this Internet Thing, maybe Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel simply discredits Blogs and Websites as Hoop La and not to be Taken Seriously.. or ....???
Well at Anyrate.. Someone at AOL surely can "Google" and well surely will bring this post to her attention and well Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel - Now you Know... You have Stepped into a Pile of Iviewit Scat that you will not easily Climb Out of ... Good Luck to You.. You can bet that I will be watching to See how you are handling this Most Amazing.. this Massive - Major.. Huge ..and well the Biggest Financial Issue of your Entire Career.
Ira Parker - Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent Research Links
NOTICE:
Julie Jacobs - AOL Inc. General Counsel:
NOW you KNOW !!!
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100108%20Letter%20to%20Tim%20Armstrong%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20091231%20Jerry%20McKinley%20AOL%20Inc%20letter%20Re%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20response.pdf
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/2010/02/ira-parker-general-counsel-and.html
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Iviewit SEC Complaint Naming Ira Parker - AOL
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
www.DeniedPatent.com
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies_16.html
http://www.matthewtriggs.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-agreements-with.html
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/p/warner-bros-aol-major-shareholder.html
Also this Press Release
"Iviewit Press Release: World Renowned Inventor of Internet Video and Image Scaling Formulae Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI CRIMINAL Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose (Christopher Wheeler), Foley &; Lardner for Patent Theft, a car bombing and more. Read all about it @
Online Interactive Version of Press Release @
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288
Hard Copy of the Release @
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html
Got a Tip on Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel ?
Got an Inside Story .. Dirt.. the Scoop on Julie Jacobs, AOL Inc. General Counsel ?
Well if So email Me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com and Let's Get Justice for the AOL Shareholders, the Iviewit Inventors, the Iviewit Investors and in Turn the "We the People".
Surely CEO Tim Armstrong has informed Julie Jacobs of what she is taking on? Or possibly being around the AOL company since 2000 - maybe Julie Jacobs knows full well of the Iviewit Technologies Stolen Patent and is part of the Corruption, Cover up and Massive Shareholder Fraud..
posted here by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)