Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner, Named in SEC Complaint, RICO Lawsuit over STEALING the Trillion Dollar iViewit Technology.

Michael Grebe is under an ongoing investigation over the Iviewit Technology theft. Though for over a decade Michael Grebe, Corrupt Patent Attorney at Foley and Lardner when the iViewit Technology was first STOLEN, well Michael Grebe has managed to keep the SEC off his Trail, the Dept. of Justice completely looking the other way, the USPTO ignoring the Michael Grebe - Foley and Lardner involvement and has managed to get State and Federal judges to cover up this mass corruption of Michael Grebe and Foley and Lardner over the Iviewit Stolen Technology.

Michael Grebe GUILTY of Massive Shareholder Fraud and Major Cover Ups in NOT disclosing the iViewit Multi-Trillion Dollar Liability. Michael Grebe was at Foley and Lardner and was one of the Original Patent Attorneys that Derailed the Iviewit Invention and Michael Grebe is part of Lockheed Martin USING this Invention and Making Billions From it.

Michael Grebe was a Corrupt Patent Attorney, and Michael Grebe, to this day DOES nothing to make any of this RIGHT. Inventors Rights were stomped on, there were attempts on the Lives of the Iviewit Inventors and their families.

The Iviewit Stolen Technology involves the biggest Law Firms and Tech Companies in the World and Lockheed Martin ... ALL are named in a Federal RICO Lawsuit, as well an SEC Complaint. Michael Grebe is named in the SEC Complaint, in that Federal RICO Lawsuit. There is over 1200 documents of proof ( http://www.iviewit.tv/ ) - there is conversations recorded with the Corrupt Patent Attorney from Foley and Lardner, Michael Grebe - www.Iviewit.TV for more on that.

Michael Grebe acted Criminal, seems to have paid off judges, court clerks, USPTO Officers (well that is not to hard as the head of the USPTO use to be at Foley and Lardner as did President Obama - So that's an easy one for Michael Grebe to keep hiding). Michael Grebe pulled some major strings to STEAL this patent so Lockheed Martin, Intel Corp. and many others could use this technology and the Iviewit Inventors have still not got a Dime. Even though Iviewit had Legal, Signed Contracts with Time Warner Inc. ( http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/ ) for more on that one).

Michael Grebe pulled off a Whammy in the Blatant Theft of an incredible technology that we all use. The iViewit technology is in every video you see, cable companies use it.. cell phones.. online ads and videos for everything online.. incredible zoom and pan.. the stopping of that dreaded pixalation.. ALL the Iviewit Invention - ALL orchestrated by the Corrupt Patent Attorney from Foley and Lardner Named Michael Grebe.

Michael Grebe is easily proven as GUILTY. Thing is Michael Grebe is connected to the Bush Administration, Donald Rumsfield and I believe high ups in homeland security.. Michael Grebe was General Council to the RNC ~ I mean come on Michael Grebe has some serious strings to pull and boy did Michael Grebe Do just that in the mis-handling and flat out theft of a Multi-Trillion dollar technology that his cronies at Lockheed Martin wanted AND well they got it. Michael Grebe simply derailed, lied, committed fraud and there you have it.. over a decade and the REAL inventors of the Iviewit Technology that we all use, well they get ruined, quality of life squashed, they get harassed, they get their cars bombed WITH NO INVESTIGATION... they get fake tax bills and all kinds of harassment to SHUT them up.. and Michael Grebe and Cronies.. well they GET Billions Every Year from the Iviewit Inventions.

Michael Grebe. Bradley Foundation Links to the Documents and Sound Bite regarding Michael Grebe STEALING a Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent that Michael Grebe of the Bradley Foundation, to this day covers up, lies about and commits fraud on.

Thomas Cahill Protects Michael Grebe
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090330%20Docket%20No%20%2008-4873-cv%20Brief%20for%20Foley%20%20Lardner%20Defendants-Appellees%20(2).pdf
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN LLP - Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees
Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael C. Grebe.

Click HERE for Videos on Michael Grebe Conversations with iViewit Founder and one of the Iviewit Technology Inventors Eliot Bernstein.

Michael Grebe, Corrupt Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney Named in what NY TIMES REPORTS as an 80M LAWSUIT CLAIMING WHITEWASHING IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS ...
Massive Corruption in Cover Ups in New York Courts involving Multi-Trillion Dollar iViewit Technologies STOLEN intellectual property.

Michael Grebe named in this Mass Corruption and another Massive Lawsuit over Iviewit and the Involvement of Corrupt Patent Attorney Michael Grebe of Foley and Larder. Yet over a Decade and Michael Grebe still is Seeming "Respectful" as he Endorses Candidates and Runs the Bradley Foundation.

Michael Grebe, Corrupt Foley and Lardner Patent Attorney Named in SEC Complaint. Click Here for SEC Complaint Naming Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner.

Click Here for RICO Complaint Naming Michael Grebe - Bradley Foundation over a Multi-Trillion Dollar Patent Theft of the iViewit Technologies.


MICHAEL C. GREBE, was a Chairman and CEO of Foley and Lardner - the Corrupt Patent Law Firm When the iVieiwit technology was STOLEN.
Click Here for Michael Grebe, Bradley Foundation Corruption

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Michael Grebe, Bradley Foundation - Corrupt ex-CEO of Foley and Lardner Complaint - Click here to Read more on Michael Grebe Corruption.

More on Michael Grebe - Bradley Foundation
and the Iviewit Stolen Technology Coming Soon.

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

Michael Grebe information on line brags that "Michael Grebe ran one of the nation's largest law firms, Foley & Lardner, before joining the influential Bradley Foundation as its CEO" ~ So there you have it Michael Grebe, Foley and Lardner... Is GUILTY of Patent Fraud, Criminal Activity, Shareholder Fraud, and More in the Iviewit Technology Stolen Intellectual Property Scandal.

Have a Tip on Michael Grebe Corruption, Michael Grebe Bradley Foundation or ANY Corrupt Activity of Michael Grebe while at the Corrupt Law Firm of Foley and Lardner.

eMail Me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC and FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro, against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, and .

Proskauer Rose and More named in SEC Complaint.

SEC Complaint Filed, is the SEC Listening .. It Does not sound like it. The SEC must be covering up for Favors owed, covering and protecting billionair tech companies and Above the Law Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner and Proskauer Rose.

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.

"" March 14, 2010 --

FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS

Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,

“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.

The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT

Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.

Anderson’s testimony http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165

HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.

Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.

Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).

As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.

Anderson’s filing http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf

Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf

The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.

Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""

"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder

Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke

US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner

USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer

Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley

Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "

Press Release for Immediate Release

Intel Corp. Named in New SEC Complaint by Iviewit Technologies - Paul Otellini - Bruce Sewell

Intel Corp. - Paul Otelleni - Bruce Sewell,
Major Shareholder Liability Pending

· March 06, 2009 Iviewit Letter of Liabilities to Intel
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

· March 25, 2009 Iviewit SEC Complaint Filed
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

· September 15, 2009 Apple Press Release ~
Intel Counsel Bruce Sewell departs Intel to Apple

http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/09/15sewell.html

· January 16, 2002 The Register “SGI transfers 3D graphics patents to MS [Microsoft]
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20020116%20SGI%20transfers%20patents%20to%20MICROSOFT.pdf

Intel Capital Rajiv Goel indicted by SEC and Intel Corporation is a defendant in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

· Intel Capital Rajiv Goel, a managing director at Intel Corporation has been implicated by the SEC in the Galleon Complaint.

o The SEC should take note that one of the first people on the scene at the time of the Iviewit inventions was a one Hassan Miah (“Miah”), who signed NDA’s while analyzing Iviewit as an Investment for EarthLink founders Sky Dylan Dayton and Kevin O’Donnell.

Hassan Miah had worked at the Intel / Creative Artist Agency (“CAA”) Multimedia Lab prior to involvement with Iviewit and upon viewing the inventions, called them the “Holy Grail” of the Digital Imaging and Video world, including the Internet. Later Miah again joined Intel at Intel Capital.

From Hassan Miah’s Biography @ Digital Hollywood

http://www.digitalhollywood.com/%231-DHEurope/London-WednesdayFive.html , I quote,

“ Hassan Miah is the former Managing Director of Intel Capital, where he led worldwide media and entertainment investments.

Today, he remains an advisor to Intel Corporation’s Digital Home Group, which is responsible for the company’s global consumer PC product line.

He is also the former head of New Media for CAA, one of Hollywood’s leading entertainment and talent agencies. While at Intel, Mr. Miah led such media related investments as Bellrock Media, Synacor, Zinio, Black Arrow, Clickstar and Gametrust.

At CAA, Mr. Hassan Miah established and headed the CAA / Intel Media Lab, the first significant collaboration between Hollywood and a major technology company, and helped form Tele-TV, a joint investment by NYNEX, PacBell and Bell Atlantic to provide interactive video television services over phone lines. Before joining CAA, Mr. Miah was a Management Consulting Partner for KPMG LLP, specializing in media and entertainment transactions.

At KPMG, he helped structure such transactions as the sale of MCA Universal Studios to Matsushita, the sale of Geffen Records to Universal and Polygram’s acquisition of A&M Records.

Hassan Miah also has extensive operating/managerial experience having developed and sold companies in the digital media sector during his career, e.g., after creating the first consumer MP3 recording software, Mr. Miah successfully sold Xing Technology Corp. to Real Networks at a 10x multiple from when he joined the company less than two years after becoming CEO.

Hassan Miah is a CPA and received a B.A. in Business from the University of Michigan and a M.B.A. from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.”

o April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies.

Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf

o June 01, 1999 – Donald G. Kane, Managing Director at Goldman Sachs letter regarding Hassan Miah and Miah’s letter requesting to speak to Rubenstein.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2006%2001%20HASSAN%20LETTER%20FORWARDED%20TO%20RUBENSTEIN.pdf

o Roomy Khan, a convicted felon and former Intel employee is pleading guilty in the Galleon case and the relations between Iviewit and Intel are already described herein.

Robert W. Moffat, Jr. ~ Senior Vice President, Integrated Operations at IBM Corporation.

· The SEC should note that IBM is a Defendant in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

March 25, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT –
Real 3D, Inc,, Intel, Silicon Graphics and Lockheed Martin

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

Full SEC Complaint Click Here
Read the Details that YOUR Intel Corp. Executive Having Been
Keep from you the Shareholders of Intel... and they have been
Failing to Disclose this Major Shareholder Liablity for Quite Some Time.

Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

More on the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent
at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Intel Executive Make Decisions that Shareholders Take the Hit On? Looks like a RICO Pattern and History to ME. Massive Shareholder Liability Alert.

Funny Intel Shareholders don't even Know what CEO Paul Otellini is hiding from them and has been for many - MANY years on the Biggest Liability that Intel Corp. has ever seen.

Way before the Legal Issues with Advanced Micro Devices, and Billions in Fines .. there was and Still is the Trillion Dollar Liability of the Iviewit Technologies Company and the Stolen Technology that has made Billions on top of Billions and still is for Intel Corp. and many others involved in this High Finance Liability that shareholders will one day soon be FORCED to looked at AND that will be a Very Jagged Pill to Swallow.

November 2009 Article - Charles A. Gilman Got Moxy and Charles Gilman is VERY right in this request, Intel Executives are not Playing fair and NOT disclosing KNOWN Liabilities to this Day.

It is NOT the Intel Shareholder's Fault, they were no part of the Decisions and SHOULD not take the Financial Hit for It.

"" Intel shareholder wants execs to pay $2.7B in fines

He doesn't want the company on the hook for antitrust fines, settlement
By Sharon Gaudin.

Computerworld -

An Intel Corp. investor, frustrated that the chip maker has been hit with $2.7 billion in fines and settlement payments, has filed suit in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the company and its top executives.

Charles A. Gilman wants the court to force company executives, including Intel President and CEO Paul Otellini, to fork over money for the fines and payments so shareholders don't take a financial hit.

The lawsuit was filed the same week Intel reached a settlement with Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) to end all antitrust litigation between the two companies. As part of the deal, Intel agreed to pay rival AMD $1.25 billion.

That followed a ruling in May by the European Commission in which Intel was found guilty of antitrust violations in the market for PC microprocessors and fined it $1.44 billion.

Gilman, who refers to himself in court documents as a "long-time shareholder," doesn't think the company and its shareholders should suffer for Intel's actions.

In a document filed in court, Gilman's attorneys contend that shareholder attempts to influence Intel's board of directors have "proved fruitless. ...Indeed, shareholder demands have been met with outright hostility, which can only bespeak bad faith."

The document also contends that Intel's board refused to investigate the antitrust charges against the company or to appoint an independent committee to review the charges and take remedial action, if needed.

" The antagonism of Intel's Board of Directors to the shareholders' demand is readily explained by growing evidence that the antitrust scheme, which spanned three continents, and which has so far led to over $1 billion in fines, was personally directed by CEO Otellini and by Intel's former board chairman, Craig R. Barrett," the document alleges.

Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research, Inc., said he's not surprised by the suit. "Someone always sues," he said, adding that he's never heard of company executives being forced to pay for any fines or settlements.

One of Gilman's attorneys, Roy Jacobs, of the firm Law Offices of Roy Jacobs in Manhattan, declined to comment on the suit. So did another Gilman attorney, Robert Goldberg, who is with Biggs and Battaglia, a Delaware law firm.

For its part, Intel promised to fight the suit. "We disagree with the plaintiff in the matter and we are planning a vigorous defense," said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman

In addition to Otellini, those named in the suit include: former CEO and ex-Chairman of the Board Barrett; directors James Plummer and Susan Decker; and former directors Carol Bartz, D. James Guzy Sr., David Pottruck, Jane Shaw, David Yoffie, Charlene Barshefsky, John Donahoe and Frank Yeary. ""


Source of Post and Article Link
http://www.computerworld.com/
s/article/9141168/Intel_shareholder_wants_execs_to_pay_2.7B_in_fines


Posted here by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

More on the Intel Liability with the Iviewit Technologies
Stolen Patent at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Also Check out www.CEOPaulOtellini.com and www.BruceSewell.com
for Intel Corp's Role in this Massive Shareholder Fraud.
Intel CEO Paul Otellini
Durward Bruce Sewell
Shareholder Activism, Advocate - Shareholder watch

Proskauer Rose - Foley and Lardner - Iviewit Stolen Patent - Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson in New York September 2009

"" « September 24, 2009 Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner
Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Larnder, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More »

September 24, 2009 Public Hearing Senator John L. Sampson NY: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman – Testimony of Eliot Bernstein, Inventor, Iviewit Technologies re Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, IBM, Proskauer Rose LLP, SGI & Lockheed Martin.

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Senator John Sampson Chairman

SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Monday June 8, 2009
NYC
250 Broadway
NY NY
10 A.M.
19th Floor

ORAL TESTIMONY BY INVITATION ONLY
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09
The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL

5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY

8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY

11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY

14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys.

Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed.

This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process. ""

Full Article, Source of Post and VIDEO Click Below
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=159

posted HERE by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications to Shareholders?

YOU Bet She Does...

How Will She Explain what She has Let Happen
in a Trillion Dollar Liability to Shareholders...???

It seems from Many documents at www.Iviewit.TV That Mary Shapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.

Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?

$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?

What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.

The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .

Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?

Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..

It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Schapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..

posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html

http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated

http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html


Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..

Crystal Cox Blogger

Blatant and Obvious Fraud on the US Court System. Patent Office Fraud, Patent Attorney Corruption, Supreme Court Corruption, Trillions of Dollars.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent Story is very interesting to Say the Least as it Exposes Corruption in US Courts, Exposes Patent Attorneys Ease in which they can Steal Inventions, Exposes Supreme Court Judges and Attorney Bar Association that Cover Up the Corruption, Side Deals and Favoritism among preferred - Elite - Wealthy Attorneys, and Really wakes you up to Big Corporations Like Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Time Warner Inc., Sony, and all the Other major Corporations participating in this Cover Up to Deny Inventors Rights, Deny Due Process and Continue Using their Technology - Simply Ignore 8 and 10 year old Contracts, Blatantly VIOLATED Confidentiality Agreements and violating Law after Law with thus far - No Accountability.

The US Patent Office Deny Rights of Inventors and Seem to be Holding up Investigations for year after year while Real Peoples Live are On Hold and In Danger.

The US Bankruptcy Court System has blatant Obvious Proven Fraud as in the Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy - the Conflicts of Interest and Illegal behavior and For Some Reason, thus far the US Bankruptcy Courts can't seem to see what has happened.

And though there are Literally thousands of Pages of documents of Proof, the US Court Sytem Seems to be Aiding And Abetting the Criminals in all this, Seemingly just because they are Major US Corporations, Meg-Law Firms, Court Judges, Supreme Court Judges, and State Attorney Bars - there is so Much Corruption Truly Where Does One Begin.

We Begin by Understanding the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story, who the Criminals Are, Who are the seemingly Protected Patent Attorneys in all this, Which Supreme Court Judges are Looking the Other way to this Blatant and Obvious Corruption, Who in the State Attorney Bar Complaint Process is Allow this. Once we understand this at least to Some Degree we can see how this happens in the US Courts and How those In Judicial Power Either Willing Let it Happen, Accept Bribes and Pay Offs, or are Threatened Somehow.

How Does a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist Get Pulled Off and For over a Decade So Far.

Well Go to the Links Below and Find Out More on How this Level of Corruption Happens in Your United States Court System.

Click Here to Read what Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J had to Say in August of 2008 about the Fraud, Deceit, and Misrepresentation in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.

Also Check Out www.DeniedPatent.com for Names and Players and How A Theft of this Magnitude Can Be Pulled Off in the United States.

Also Go to www.Iviewit.TV Scroll Down Read Through some Documents, I know it is a Lot to Take in, but boy does it Open your Eyes to How Easy Trillion Dollar Heists Really are when you Know the Right People and have the Right Money.

Smaller inventors Smackdown - David Kappos, USPTO formerly IBM ....the Whining of Billion Dollar Tech Companies

Small Inventors, Millionaire have No Chance as David Kappos is there to Protect the Big Tech Companies from YOU and is NOT even Hiding it. As in the Iviewit Stolen Patent www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV ~ We see that big law firms, connection in high places such as to the head of the USPTO sure does come in handy hwen you want to Strip Inventors of their Rights.

David Kappos leads the Charge - the Reign of Terror on Small Inventors - you may as well Hide your Technology and Patent it in another Country, the US Patent Office is NOT looking Out for you....

Here is the Story...

From the Article Below we see more Evidence of how David Kappos's IBM connections and his appointment to the USPTO was Deliberat to Shut up those Small Inventors as they try and license their Technology.

$$$$$$

"" IBM veteran gets panel OK to run patent office
Kappos helped run massive patent operation; Full vote expected in Sept.

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) - David Kappos, a former IBM Corp. executive who spent years helping Big Blue amass a forbidding warchest of intellectual property, was approved by a Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday to become the next director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

A full vote on Kappos' nomination is expected after the Senate's summer recess.

David Kappos is expected to lend the perspective of large technology firms, while shaking up an embattled institution.

Technology companies have long complained that the patent office isn't sufficiently exacting, and awards too many dubious legal protections. Smaller inventors and patent holding firms, however, rely on winning a wide range of patents originated at the office to elbow their way into markets and win licensing fees.

The patent office "has not been able to keep pace with the avalanche of applications it has received in recent years," David Kappos said in testimony delivered on behalf of IBM to the Senate Judiciary Committee in March. That in turn, Kappos complained, has contributed to "increased speculation" and a surplus of lawsuits.

While that echoed the sentiments of many other large technology companies, IBM has a somewhat unique perspective. It has historically developed and acquired patents at an exhaustive pace, setting a standard aspired to by peers such as Microsoft Corp.

Indeed, Microsoft hired Marshall Phelps, Kappos' former colleague at IBM, to head its intellectual property licensing efforts in 2003. The companies' approach has blurred the lines, some say, between simply protecting business lines and seeking to bulk up on legal claims and licensing.

In 2008, IBM topped the list of U.S. technology companies winning patents for the 16th year in a row, with over 4,000. As Kappos noted in his March testimony, IBM became the first company ever to amass that many patents in a single year.

Microsoft ranked fourth, with 2,030 patents - behind Samsung and Canon, and one notch ahead of Intel Corp. IBM, along with many other large technology companies, has supported proposed patent reform legislation on Capitol Hill. That legislation seeks to improve the quality of patents, and cut down on the numerous lawsuits and significant jury awards regularly faced by large companies. ""

Full Article and Source
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ibm-veteran-gets-panel-ok-to-run-patent-office-2009-08-06
David Kappos, IBM and Kappos,

Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. - the IviewIt Technology Lawsuit over Stolen Patents

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT ORDERS RUBENSTEIN FOR INVESTIGATION FOR CONFLICT AND VIOLATION OF PUBLIC OFFICES

REBUTTAL RESPONSE TO RUBENSTEIN BAR COMPLAINT

Patent evaluator and creator of the MPEGLA, LLC, and the criminal organizations store front that acts as an anticompetitive monopolistic patent pool, a criminal organization subject to RICO charges as these crimes are tried, currently the crimes are the subject of a several year federal investigation of the patent office and FBI.

If I were you dear reader, I would not pay too much to MPEGLA for a license that is worthless without my inventions. WARNING - to all young inventors, MPEGLA may be a dead inventor pool, whereby they promise inventors a chance to share in royalties of a "standard".

Be weary, they may promise the world to you and then fund you but if they are doing what they have tried to do with me, they are planning on stealing your inventions and ruining your life, an extracting your patents through a variety of racketeering means, if you raise questions or catch them, they try to murder you.

Now here is a guy, this Rubenstein sham, who once given your inventions under attorney/client privilege tries to claim them as his own by putting them into his new law firm Proskauer’s recently acquired patent pool, acquired after learning of our processes Rubenstein then just tries to rub you out.

Rubenstein, in our case, hires a crooked attorney, Raymond Anthony Joao, as his partner to file our patents in his name (Joao puts 90 patents in his name, rivaling Edison) talk about brazen. An attorney turned multi-media inventor, an attorney has not had an inventive idea since Socrates proposed law, he was although a philosopher first. All the while Joao is taking disclosures on the very inventions he is contracted by Rubenstein and Porksour to patent for me, the other inventors and other shareholders.

Rubenstein in his psychosis, then tries to ice you out of your inventions through anticompetitive practices in violation of Sherman and Clayton, with a heavy overtone of Racketeering. Violating virtually all of his federal patent oaths at the patent bar.

Oh yeah, he is under investigation by the United States Patent & Trademark Office for crimes against the United States and foreign nations, along with the FBI, which has caused my patents to be in a limbotic state of suspension, IVIEWIT PATENT SUSPENSION NOTICE.

These guys were above the law, as lawyers they figured they could steal the inventions from me like candy... or so they thought, ah "the best laid plans."

Rubenstein is so grotesque as to become obsessed with your inventions and forget he is even an attorney. He is not a lawyer in the sense of doing societal good, he is a lawyer that has learned ways to rob people through law, more a petty thief, with eyes on the jewels of our country at the patent office? Rubenstein's envy of the inventiveness of inventors is exhibited in virtually his whole being, as he attempts to claim others ideas as his own, he loses part of his brain in the delusions to people like me and I gnaw.

Then when busted, under deposition caught lying, he even tried to claim he never heard of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein, under sworn oath, in the face of insurmountable evidence against him. He felt above the law with Judge Jorge Labarga, (Labarga infamous for failing to recount the Bush election and passing the election to the Supreme Court, leading to the demise of the country) in his pocket. Yet, as the evidence shows, Rubenstein had far more knowledge of Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit, he was in fact a board member, a shareholder, the lead patent attorney for the company, opining to Warner Bros., Huizenga, Wachovia, investors, etc.

At his deposition, he is confronted with letters from Warner Bros. stating he opined favorably on the Iviewit inventions, this immediately after he claimed that he never heard of us.

You see he was our patent counsel and the conflict with his patent pool (which would be worthless without the Iviewit scaling inventions) was beyond obvious and illegal. He never thought it would get out control, he had thought this through over and over again, with other criminal attorneys (I mean criminals disguised as attorneys) and they failed to account for me. Not only will his MPEG patent stealing scheme be worthless when I am done, so soon shall he be, if he is not already tying his noose.

Investors even relied on Rubenstein's opinion to invest and then wrote letters fingering him, making his deposition statements perjurious. So in his fucked up head, to protect his pools from extinction, he had to steal them?

Hey Ken, the shareholders await the answers to the questions they sent you, how have you failed to answer them, the shareholders of course? Your attempt to try to get rid of the inventors, at any cost, knowing your MPEG sham would have been out of business, especially if we partnered with someone other than MPEG, say Intel, oops they are in this deep with you, so instead say Apple, it would have rendered you and your sham patent pool as impotent as it is soon to become.

Was Kenneth Rubenstein behind the car bombing of my family's car as witnessed on the www.iviewit.tv site? No matter, he was the direct cause; a true freak of nature, I would not trust him with my patents, or yours. "

Source of Post

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm#family